Re: ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL: Short-cut syntax for in-out and in-only patterns from Jean-Jacques Moreau on 2003-11-03 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from November 2003)

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 16:39:36 +0100
To: "Amelia A. Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>
Cc: sanjiva@watson.ibm.com, www-ws-desc@w3.org, youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr
Message-ID: <3FA676B8.6090108@crf.canon.fr>

I (obviously) have more sympathy for variable tag names, which were the 
subject of my earlier proposal, but I definitely prefer Amy's (friendly) 
amendment to Sanjiva's original.

Jean-Jacques.

Amelia A. Lewis wrote:

[large snip]

> Introduce the following rule:
>     - When a pattern contains only one message in a given direction,
> then the messageReference attribute is optional.  When a pattern
> contains more than one message in a given direction, then the
> messageReference attribute is required (to disambiguate which message is
> defined by the element).

Received on Monday, 3 November 2003 10:40:29 UTC