www-rdf-interest@w3.org from June 2002 by author

Aaron Swartz

• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Stock Quotes in RDF (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Monday, 3 June)
• N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Monday, 3 June)

Alan Lillich

• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Multiple rdf:type elements (Thursday, 6 June)

Alberto Reggiori

• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (Tuesday, 25 June)
• ANNOUNCEMENT: RDF Query and Rule languages use cases and survey (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (was: Re: Out of context, in context, out of subject ????) (Monday, 24 June)
• Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (was: Re: Out of context, in context, out of subject ????) (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Thursday, 6 June)
• XML vs. RDF vs. N-Triples vs. N3 vs. CSV saga is up again (was: Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need ) (Tuesday, 4 June)

Andy Seaborne

• Report of ad hoc Query/NetAPI meeting at ISWC/Sardinia (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Wednesday, 5 June)

Arnold deVos

• Re: Innovation, community and queries (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: Innovation, community and queries (Saturday, 1 June)

Bill de hÓra

• RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages) (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages) (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Monday, 3 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Monday, 3 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Monday, 3 June)

by way of

• Latest version (1.3) of RDF Web Scraper available (Tuesday, 11 June)

Chris Goolsby

• RE: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Friday, 28 June)

cristy455@hotmail.com

• The insiders look -- eBay and . . . 18010 (Tuesday, 25 June)

Dan Brickley

• "rdf rules"! (and rdf query) (Saturday, 22 June)
• RDF Parser for PHP (fwd) (Saturday, 15 June)
• Relational Data Mining School (fwd) (Friday, 14 June)
• RE: Multiple rdf:type elements (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need (was Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Monday, 3 June)

Daniele Capursi

• Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics asRDFschemas versus Web pages) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics asRDFschemas versus Web pages) (Thursday, 6 June)

Danny Ayers

• RE: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Saturday, 29 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Thursday, 6 June)

Dave Beckett

• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Wednesday, 26 June)
• ANNOUNCEMENT: Redland RDF Application Framework 0.9.11 (Saturday, 8 June)
• Announcement: Raptor RDF Parser Toolkit 0.9.5 (Saturday, 8 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Thursday, 6 June)

Dave Reynolds

• Re: Challenge? Using RDF in "real" surroundings (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics asRDFschemas versus Web pages) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics asRDFschemas versus Web pages) (Friday, 7 June)

Didier

• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (was: Re: Out of context, in context, out of subject ????) (Friday, 21 June)
• Out of context, in context, out of subject ???? (Friday, 21 June)

Didier VILLEVALOIS

• RE: SubClassOf vs Child Element (Thursday, 6 June)

ezgo@w3.org

• 超值雙組合=駭客技術加新名單 BAZkKUN8LQEzMjYTc (Sunday, 16 June)

Frank Manola

• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Monday, 3 June)

Geoff Chappell

• Re: Datatype question (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Datatype question (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Datatype question (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Datatype question (Monday, 24 June)
• Datatype question (Sunday, 23 June)
• ANNOUNCE: RDF Gateway v0.9.5 Released (Tuesday, 18 June)

Gerd Stumme

• ECML/PKDD Semantic Web Mining: Call for Project Descriptions (Thursday, 20 June)

Graham Klyne

• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Sunday, 9 June)
• Re: Multiple rdf:type elements (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Monadic predicates in RDF (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Innovation, community and queries (Tuesday, 4 June)
• RE: Innovation, community and queries (Tuesday, 4 June)

Guus Schreiber

• RDF-WordNet: representation issues (Wednesday, 26 June)

James Tauber

• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Monday, 24 June)

Jeen Broekstra

• Challenge? Using RDF in "real" surroundings (Thursday, 20 June)

Jeremy Gray

• RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Sunday, 9 June)
• RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Friday, 7 June)
• RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Friday, 7 June)
• RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Friday, 7 June)
• Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Thursday, 6 June)

Jie-Eun Hwang

• SubClassOf vs Child Element (Thursday, 6 June)

john.nj.davies@bt.com

• RE: Challenge? Using RDF in "real" surroundings (Thursday, 20 June)

Jonathan Borden

• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (was: Re: Out of context, in context, out of subject ????) (Friday, 21 June)

Jos De_Roo

• RE: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Wednesday, 26 June)

Joshua Allen

• RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: XML vs. RDF vs. N-Triples vs. N3 vs. CSV saga is up again (was: Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need ) (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)

Leo Obrst

• Call For Papers: Information and Knowledge Engineering Conference (IKE-2003) (Tuesday, 25 June)

Manos Batsis

• RE: Challenge? Using RDF in "real" surroundings (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Thursday, 13 June)
• RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Question (RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages)) (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• RE: RDF in HTML: Approaches (Monday, 3 June)

MDaconta@aol.com

• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Monday, 24 June)
• Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Monday, 24 June)

Michael Grove

• New RDF tools available (Thursday, 27 June)
• New tool to convert delimited text files to RDF (Monday, 17 June)

Michael Kifer

• New release of FLORA-2 (Sunday, 9 June)
• Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need (was Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Monday, 3 June)

Mikael Nilsson

• Re: Topic Map RDF vocabulary (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Topic Map RDF vocabulary (Tuesday, 18 June)

Narahari, Sateesh

• RE: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Tuesday, 25 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Monday, 3 June)

Nataliya Roberts

• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Thursday, 27 June)

Nelson Reed

• INVESTMENT OFFER (Wednesday, 5 June)

Nikita Ogievetsky

• Re: Topic Map RDF vocabulary (Tuesday, 18 June)

Patrick Peccatte \(IPA\)

• [ANN] Catalogue 3.1: gathering metadata, building HTML/XML/RDF reports (Wednesday, 5 June)

Patrick Stickler

• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Datatype question (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Datatype question (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Datatype question (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Datatype question (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Datatype question (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (was: Re: Out of context, in context, out of subject ????) (Monday, 24 June)
• Scope/Context specific run-time selection of Assertions (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (was: Re: Out of context, in context, out of subject ????) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (was: Re: Out of context, in context, out of subject ????) (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Datatype question (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Using entities [was Re: RDFX: My "vision" for an RDF/XML serialization, for both assertions and queries (RDF 2.0)? ] (Sunday, 23 June)
• Re: Using entities [was Re: RDFX: My "vision" for an RDF/XML serialization, for both assertions and queries (RDF 2.0)? ] (Sunday, 23 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XMLNamesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: RDFX: My "vision" for an RDF/XML serialization, for both assertions and queries (RDF 2.0)? (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• RDFX: My "vision" for an RDF/XML serialization, for both assertions and queries (RDF 2.0)? (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics asRDFschemas versus Web pages) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics asRDFschemas versus Web pages) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics asRDFschemas versus Web pages) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: XML vs. RDF vs. N-Triples vs. N3 vs. CSV saga is up again (was: Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need ) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: Re[2]: Resume schema in RDF (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: Universe (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Question (RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages)) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Resume schema in RDF (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDFschemas versus Web pages) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: XML vs. RDF vs. N-Triples vs. N3 vs. CSV saga is up again (was: Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need ) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need (was Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need (was Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need (was Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need (was Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: Innovation, community and queries (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: Innovation, community and queries (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: Innovation, community and queries (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: Innovation, community and queries (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: Innovation, community and queries (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: Innovation, community and queries (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: Innovation, community and queries (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: RDF in HTML: Approaches (Monday, 3 June)

paulhh@www.snatzo.com

• Automated reply from paulhh@www.snatzo.com (Friday, 7 June)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Monday, 3 June)

Roland Schwaenzl

• Re: Multiple rdf:type elements (Friday, 7 June)
• Universe (Thursday, 6 June)

Ronald Daniel

• RE: Multiple rdf:type elements (Thursday, 6 June)

Sampo Syreeni

• RE: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Using entities [was Re: RDFX: My "vision" for an RDF/XML serialization, for both assertions and queries (RDF 2.0)? ] (Saturday, 22 June)

Seaborne, Andy

• RE: Report of ad hoc Query/NetAPI meeting at ISWC/Sardinia (Saturday, 22 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Saturday, 8 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Thursday, 6 June)
• RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Thursday, 6 June)

Sean B. Palmer

• Re: Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress (Thursday, 6 June)
• RDF in HTML: Approaches (Sunday, 2 June)

Seth Ladd

• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Tuesday, 25 June)

Seth Russell

• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Monday, 3 June)

Simon Raboczi

• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Friday, 7 June)

Steffen Staab

• Re: Challenge? Using RDF in "real" surroundings (Thursday, 20 June)

Stephen K. Rhoads

• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell? (Monday, 24 June)
• RDF Schema for International "Physical" Addressing? (Friday, 21 June)

Tayeb Lemlouma

• Re: New tool to convert delimited text files to RDF (Tuesday, 18 June)

Teresa Pereira

• Defining the metadata:subTitle (Friday, 7 June)

Thomas B. Passin

• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XMLNamesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Sunday, 9 June)
• Re: Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics asRDFschemas versus Web pages) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDFschemas versus Web pages) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need (was Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Tuesday, 4 June)

Tomoko Yaginuma

• Empirical comparison of RDF and Topic Maps (Tuesday, 18 June)

tony_hammond

• Hspace (Saturday, 8 June)
• Du programme. (Friday, 7 June)

U

• Give This One A Chance, You Will Be Glad You Did. (Monday, 3 June)

Uche Ogbuji

• Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: RDF Query and Rule languages use cases and survey (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Report of ad hoc Query/NetAPI meeting at ISWC/Sardinia (Saturday, 22 June)
• Re: Using entities [was Re: RDFX: My "vision" for an RDF/XML serialization, for both assertions and queries (RDF 2.0)? ] (Saturday, 22 June)
• Re: Report of ad hoc Query/NetAPI meeting at ISWC/Sardinia (Saturday, 22 June)
• Using entities [was Re: RDFX: My "vision" for an RDF/XML serialization, for both assertions and queries (RDF 2.0)? ] (Saturday, 22 June)
• ANN: Versa spec, tutorial updated (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: Multiple rdf:type elements (Monday, 10 June)
• Surprising/Impressive/Satisfying RDF mindshare at XML Web Services One (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...) (Sunday, 9 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) (Thursday, 6 June)
• [OT] Broken browsers (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: Innovation, community and queries (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: Innovation, community and queries (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: Innovation, community and queries (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: Innovation, community and queries (Monday, 3 June)

Uldis Bojars

• Re[2]: Resume schema in RDF (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress (Thursday, 6 June)
• Resume schema in RDF (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress (Tuesday, 4 June)

Wolfgang Nejdl

• Open Ph.D. and Postdoc Positions (Friday, 14 June)

׫���˱༭��@w3.org

• "�ҿ���ǹ����ɴ"������ (Thursday, 6 June)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 June 2002 01:26:23 UTC