- From: <MDaconta@aol.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 17:34:31 EDT
- To: rhoads@thrupoint.net, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Received on Monday, 24 June 2002 17:35:30 UTC
In a message dated 6/24/02 1:23:56 PM, rhoads@thrupoint.net writes: > Are RDF and XML Schema competing solutions? Yes. Here is an analogy to > human speech which I like to make: > > I agree. I do believe they are competing technologies. Especially since both can represent literal values. But, that makes it harder for RDF as Schema is dominant. So, the burden of proof is on RDF to have a clear value proposition for adoption. > RDF: > > XML ---> Vocal Chords > RDF ---> Grammar > RDF Schema ---> Vocabulary > > XML Schema: > > XML ---> Vocal Chords > XML Schema ---> Grammar/Vocabulary > This is an interesting analogy. Can you show me an example that demonstrates it? Thanks, - Mike > ------------------------------- > Michael C. Daconta > Director, Web and Technology Services > www.mcbrad.com
Received on Monday, 24 June 2002 17:35:30 UTC