W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > June 2002

Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?

From: <MDaconta@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 17:34:31 EDT
Message-ID: <11c.13207905.2a48ea67@aol.com>
To: rhoads@thrupoint.net, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
In a message dated 6/24/02 1:23:56 PM, rhoads@thrupoint.net writes:
> Are RDF and XML Schema competing solutions?  Yes.  Here is an analogy to
> human speech which I like to make:
I agree.  I do believe they are competing technologies.  Especially since
both can represent literal values.  But, that makes it harder for RDF as 
Schema is dominant.  So, the burden of proof is on RDF to have a 
clear value proposition for adoption.

> RDF:
> XML         ---&gt;  Vocal Chords
> RDF         ---&gt;  Grammar
> RDF Schema  ---&gt;  Vocabulary
> XML Schema:
> XML         ---&gt;  Vocal Chords
> XML Schema  ---&gt;  Grammar/Vocabulary
This is an interesting analogy.  Can you show me an example that 
demonstrates it?  


 - Mike
> -------------------------------
> Michael C. Daconta
> Director, Web and Technology Services
> www.mcbrad.com
Received on Monday, 24 June 2002 17:35:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:37 UTC