- From: Thomas B. Passin <tpassin@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 21:33:24 -0400
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
[Seth Russell > > Ok, now I know what you meant ... but incidentally that is not N-Triples > .... for the record, below are some references to N-Triples, which to my > knowledg cannot be 'naturally encoded in XML' unless you do something like > ParseType='literal' but then just about anything could be 'naturally encoded > in XML'. > Sure, that's why we've got XML, right? Cheers, Tom P
Received on Monday, 3 June 2002 21:34:46 UTC