Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)

[Seth Russell
>
> Ok, now I know what you meant ... but incidentally that is not N-Triples
> .... for the record, below are some references to N-Triples, which to my
> knowledg cannot be 'naturally encoded in XML' unless you do something like
> ParseType='literal' but then just about anything could be 'naturally
encoded
> in XML'.
>

Sure, that's why we've got XML, right?

Cheers,

Tom P

Received on Monday, 3 June 2002 21:34:46 UTC