- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 20:14:42 +0100
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > -----Original Message----- > From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Aaron > Swartz > > As long as we continue to stick with XML as our data format, > we will be > seen as more complicated than XML (extra work) and will likely > not be used. By moving away we have at least a chance at seeming > simpler (which > I believe RDF is) and getting used. I disagree XML in itself is the sticking point. The thing to do is beat on the XML syntax until it's as simple as RDF is supposed to be. Bill de hÓra -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPPvAIOaWiFwg2CH4EQIreQCgxBwLf7XV/52igiDQqzMXh8C9llwAn1D8 fhZTXS4Yfbn1ZHBJFy10uoyR =Zqba -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 3 June 2002 15:18:44 UTC