- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 12:36:52 -0400
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
"Schema" is a tad ambiguous; there is more than one schema language. Before getting into technical details, could you say which "schema" is "Schema"? XML Schema? Something else? --Frank MDaconta@aol.com wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I am fairly new to this list but hope you can help me > in defending RDF as an architectural direction. > About six months ago, for a government integration project we > proposed RDF as our registry data model but encountered > significant resistance from developers, data architects and > decision makers. One suprising source of resistance was > from an XML instructor who stated (to the class), "RDF is unnecessary, > Schema can do everything RDF can." > > So, although this issue has many angles, I'd like to begin with > this question, "Are RDF and Schema competitors?" > > I think this is a central issue as most current RDF examples (like > dublin core and RSS) could be done with Schema. My gut feel is > that current RDF applications have not demonstrated the power > of a "killer relationship" between resources (or concepts). > > What are your thoughts or experiences? > Have others experienced this Schema versus RDF problem? > > I am getting ready to redress this issue and I would like > to have as much ammunition as I can carry. Of course, > concrete examples are best. > > Looking forward to discussing this, > > - Mike > ------------------------------- > Michael C. Daconta > Director, Web and Technology Services > www.mcbrad.com -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-8752
Received on Monday, 24 June 2002 12:37:02 UTC