- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 16:36:45 +0100
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > -----Original Message----- > From: Joshua Allen [mailto:joshuaa@microsoft.com] > Sent: 04 June 2002 04:44 > To: Bill de hÓra; www-rdf-interest@w3.org > Subject: RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches) > > > > I disagree XML in itself is the sticking point. The thing to do > > is beat on the XML syntax until it's as simple as RDF is > supposed to be. > > I'm just curious; what exactly is wrong with n-triples? I don't know, other than RDF-Core taking the time to mention it's ultimately for testing software. I suspect XML is a good wagon to hitch a ride on. Bill de hÓra -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPPybPuaWiFwg2CH4EQI7sACgzFCMFZYdb25mk0WXQyvUY+LUPfYAn1jA vably5vDkM3HdwbS6z8WKRep =wCjO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2002 11:39:07 UTC