- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 02:03:52 -0600
- To: "Andy Seaborne" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> The query and remote access areas will proceed independently - Alberto > Reggiori offered to initiate discussions in the query area and Andy > Seaborne offered to initiate discussions in the remote access area. > > The query thread of discussion will use the existing mailing list > www-rdf-rules@w3.org > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-rules/> Why is discussion of RDF query mixed up in a mailing list on RDF rules? For those of us trying to minimize the burden of mailing list subscriptions, shouldn't there be a mailing list dedicated to such an important topic as RDF query? -- Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc. http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com Track chair, XML/Web Services One (San Jose, Boston): http://www.xmlconference.com/ DAML Reference - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/05/01/damlref.html The Languages of the Semantic Web - http://www.newarchitectmag.com/documents/s= 2453/new1020218556549/index.html XML, The Model Driven Architecture, and RDF @ XML Europe - http://www.xmleurope.com/2002/kttrack.asp#themodel
Received on Saturday, 22 June 2002 04:25:00 UTC