- From: Uldis Bojars <uldis.bojars@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:52:18 +0200
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Hi, Patrick! Sorry to trouble you again, but I have more questions than answers. (and these questions must look too simple to most people here). PS> <cv:Sex rdf:about="voc:blackeye.vsaa.lv/cv/sex/male"> PS> <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Male</rdfs:label> PS> <rdfs:label xml:lang="fi">Mies</rdfs:label> PS> ... PS> </cv:Sex> Do these statements create instance voc:blackeye.vsaa.lv/cv/sex/male that I can refer to? If I do the same for /cv/sex/female, will it be correct to define person's sex property as: <rdf:Property rdf:about="&cv_rdfs;sex" rdfs:label="sex"> <rdfs:comment> Man / Woman. </rdfs:comment> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&cv_rdfs;Person"/> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="voc:blackeye.vsaa.lv/cv/sex/"/> </rdf:Property> Since I was unsure about the approach above, I followed another way: 1. Defined SexProperty and it's instances (copied from SUO.daml): <rdf:Description ID="SexProperty"> <rdfs:label>SexProperty</rdfs:label> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Class"/> </rdf:Description> <rdf:Description ID="Female"> <rdfs:label>Female</rdfs:label> <rdf:type rdf:resource="#SexProperty"/> </rdf:Description> <rdf:Description ID="Male"> <rdfs:label>Male</rdfs:label> <rdf:type rdf:resource="#SexProperty"/> </rdf:Description> 2. Defined range for sex property then: <rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://nightman.lv/~captsolo/base.rdfs"/> Is this way to define this property valid and OK? I still do not understand where physically you define taxonomy for the former case, to use property value voc:blackeye.vsaa.lv/cv/sex/male for example. Another unclear question is defining boolean values. Are there some standard "TRUE" and "FALSE" or "YES" and "NO" URIs to use? -- Best regards, Uldis mailto:uldis.bojars@gmx.net
Received on Thursday, 6 June 2002 04:52:30 UTC