w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from September 2003 by date

Wednesday, 1 October 2003

• LC2 (or whatever) semantics ready for pub pat hayes
• Re: Fwd: Re: comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document pat hayes

Tuesday, 30 September 2003

• Re: pfps-04, pfps-06 pat hayes
• Re: Fwd: Re: comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document Dan Connolly
• Re: collecting objections Frank Manola
• Re: Fwd: Re: comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document Jos De_Roo
• pfps-04, pfps-06 Brian McBride
• Re: collecting objections pat hayes
• Re: collecting objections pat hayes
• Re: Fwd: Re: comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document Dan Connolly
• Re: Fwd: Re: comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document pat hayes
• RE: Fwd: Re: comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Is this really it? (was: I18N response draft3) Graham Klyne
• Re: Fwd: Re: comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document Brian McBride
• Re: Fwd: Re: comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document Dan Connolly
• Re: figure fixed Brian McBride
• RE: Is this really it? (was: I18N response draft3) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Is this really it? (was: I18N response draft3) Graham Klyne
• Re: Fwd: Re: comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document Graham Klyne
• Re: RDFCore issue pfps-12 Graham Klyne
• Fwd: Re: comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document pat hayes

Monday, 29 September 2003

• running new bnode id text text past pfps Brian McBride
• Re: Is this really it? (was: I18N response draft3) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposed modification to syntax re xml:lang Graham Klyne
• Re: I18N rebuttal - for review Graham Klyne
• Re: new shadow TR space Jeremy Carroll
• Proposed modification to syntax re xml:lang Jeremy Carroll
• Is this really it? (was: I18N response draft3) Graham Klyne
• I18N rebuttal - for review Jeremy Carroll
• Re: collecting objections Patrick Stickler
• Re: Minutes of 2003-09-26 RDFCore teleconference Jeremy Carroll
• Re: collecting objections Patrick Stickler

Saturday, 27 September 2003

• Re: collecting objections Jeremy Carroll
• Re: collecting objections pat hayes

Friday, 26 September 2003

• figure fixed pat hayes
• Semantics tweaks in http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semantics_LC2.html pat hayes
• Minutes of 2003-09-26 RDFCore teleconference Graham Klyne
• Re: collecting objections Martin Duerst
• Re: collecting objections Dan Connolly
• Lbase-purged sematnics doc pat hayes
• Re: rdfcore 2003-09-25 telecon agenda Frank Manola
• Re: defusing objections [was Re: NotAccepted's against semantics] pat hayes
• reminded RDF IG to send comments (by Oct 2) Dan Brickley
• new shadow TR space Dan Brickley
• I18N response draft3 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdfcore 2003-09-25 telecon agenda Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [Fwd: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group] Graham Klyne
• Re: rdfcore 2003-09-25 telecon agenda Graham Klyne
• Re: NFC Graham Klyne
• Re: rdfcore 2003-09-25 telecon agenda Patrick Stickler
• Re: rdfcore 2003-09-25 telecon agenda Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdfcore 2003-09-25 telecon agenda Jos De_Roo
• Re: rdfcore 2003-09-25 telecon agenda Dan Brickley
• I18N response draft2 - and possible concessions Jeremy Carroll
• Legacy and rdf:XMLLiteral Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdfcore 2003-09-25 telecon agenda Jeremy Carroll
• Re: defusing objections [was Re: NotAccepted's against semantics] Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 25 September 2003

• Re: defusing objections [was Re: NotAccepted's against semantics] Ramanathan Guha
• rdfcore 2003-09-25 telecon agenda Dan Brickley
• Re: defusing objections [was Re: NotAccepted's against semantics] Dan Brickley
• Re: defusing objections [was Re: NotAccepted's against semantics] Dan Brickley
• defusing objections [was Re: NotAccepted's against semantics] Brian McBride
• NotAccepted's against semantics Brian McBride
• RE: Review of nodeID text Jeremy Carroll
• RE: NFC Jeremy Carroll
• running late w/ agenda Dan Brickley
• Re: collecting objections Brian McBride
• Re: Review of nodeID text Dave Beckett
• Re: NFC Dave Beckett
• NFC Jeremy Carroll
• RE: [Fwd: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group] Jeremy Carroll
• [Fwd: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group] Brian McBride
• Re: Proposed reply to Dave Reynolds Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 24 September 2003

• weekly call for telecon agenda items Dan Brickley
• Proposed reply to Dave Reynolds Jeremy Carroll
• Re: xmlsch-02: (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-09-19 (more on xmlsch-02)) Graham Klyne
• Re: xmlsch-02: (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-09-19 (more on xmlsch-02)) Patrick Stickler

Tuesday, 23 September 2003

• RE: Review of nodeID text Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Review of nodeID text Dave Beckett

Monday, 22 September 2003

• Re: collecting objections Dan Connolly
• collecting objections Jeremy Carroll
• Review of nodeID text Jeremy Carroll
• reminder and possible regrets for Friday 9/26 Frank Manola
• Re: RDF URIs - proposal Graham Klyne
• xmlsch-02: (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-09-19 (more on xmlsch-02)) Graham Klyne

Saturday, 20 September 2003

• Re: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. Graham Klyne

Monday, 22 September 2003

• RE: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Friday, 19 September 2003

• Re: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF URIs - proposal Martin Duerst
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. pat hayes
• Minutes 19 09 2003 Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 18 September 2003

• RE: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. Graham Klyne

Friday, 19 September 2003

• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-09-19 (more on xmlsch-02) Dan Connolly
• Re: RDF URIs - proposal Dan Connolly
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. Jeremy Carroll
• RDF URIs - proposal Jeremy Carroll
• IRIs - more on space Jeremy Carroll
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. Jos De_Roo

Thursday, 18 September 2003

• Re: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. Dan Brickley
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. pat hayes
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. pat hayes
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. pat hayes
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. pat hayes
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. pat hayes
• Re: can we leave relative URI references unconstrained? (no, don't think so after all) Dan Brickley

Friday, 17 October 2003

• Re: can we leave relative URI references unconstrained? (no, don't think so after all) Brian McBride

Thursday, 18 September 2003

• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-09-19 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com

Friday, 17 October 2003

• strawman lc2 schedule Brian McBride

Thursday, 18 September 2003

• Re: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. Jeremy Carroll
• Re: can we leave relative URI references unconstrained? (no, don't think so after all) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. Dan Connolly
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. Jeremy Carroll
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. Graham Klyne
• Re: action item update (was Re: agenda for rdfcore 2003-09-12 telecon) Brian McBride
• action item update (was Re: agenda for rdfcore 2003-09-12 telecon) Dan Brickley
• Re: Minutes of 2003-09-12 RDFCore WG telcon Dan Brickley
• Re: Minutes of 2003-09-12 RDFCore WG telcon Brian McBride
• 20030919 telecon, possible regrets Graham Klyne
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. Patrick Stickler
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought. pat hayes

Wednesday, 17 September 2003

• call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Re: proposed closure take 2 Re: proposed closure of Issue pfps-11 (rdfs:comment implies entailments no) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: draft response to pfps re nfc Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 16 September 2003

• Re: draft response to pfps re nfc Martin Duerst
• Re: proposed closure take 2 Re: proposed closure of Issue pfps-11 (rdfs:comment implies entailments no) Dan Brickley
• Re: proposed closure take 2 Re: proposed closure of Issue pfps-11 (rdfs:comment implies entailments no) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: can we leave relative URI references unconstrained? (no, don't think so after all) Dan Brickley
• can we leave relative URI references unconstrained? (no, don't think so after all) Dan Connolly
• RE: Minutes of 2003-09-12 RDFCore WG telcon Jeremy Carroll
• Minutes of 2003-09-12 RDFCore WG telcon Dave Beckett

Monday, 15 September 2003

• Re: comment on current deliberations in RDF Core concerning the lexical space of XML Schema datatypes Dan Connolly

Saturday, 13 September 2003

• Re: comment on current deliberations in RDF Core concerning the lexical space of XML Schema datatypes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Arrrrr! Frank Manola
• Re: comment on current deliberations in RDF Core concerning the lexical space of XML Schema datatypes pat hayes

Friday, 12 September 2003

• Re: agenda for rdfcore 2003-09-12 telecon Jos De_Roo
• Re: agenda for rdfcore 2003-09-12 telecon Dan Brickley
• Re: agenda for rdfcore 2003-09-12 telecon Graham Klyne
• New RDF media type draft Graham Klyne
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals pat hayes
• Fwd: browsable test results Eric Miller
• Re: escaping % in RDF URI references Martin Duerst
• xmlsch-02 - another way? Jan Grant
• Re: agenda for rdfcore 2003-09-12 telecon Jan Grant
• Re: agenda for rdfcore 2003-09-12 telecon Patrick Stickler
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Patrick Stickler

Thursday, 11 September 2003

• ACTION 2003-08-29#1 Graham Klyne
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Graham Klyne
• Re: weekly call for telecon agenda items Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF MIME registration Graham Klyne
• agenda for rdfcore 2003-09-12 telecon Dan Brickley
• Re: draft response to pfps re nfc Jeremy Carroll
• Re: escaping % in RDF URI references Jeremy Carroll
• Probable regrets for telecon Patrick Stickler
• [Fwd: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group] Brian McBride
• Re: RDF MIME registration Aaron Swartz
• Re: minutes 2003-09-05 (draft for approval) Brian McBride
• weekly call for telecon agenda items Dan Brickley
• leaving MITRE; want to continue Frank Manola
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: draft response to pfps re nfc Brian McBride
• Re: escaping % in RDF URI references Brian McBride
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Brian McBride
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Brian McBride

Wednesday, 10 September 2003

• RE: about " 3 "^^xsd:integer Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: about " 3 "^^xsd:integer Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: about " 3 "^^xsd:integer Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Is there a test case for this? Jeremy Carroll
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Is there a test case for this? Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Graham Klyne
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Graham Klyne
• Is there a test case for this? Graham Klyne
• Re: about " 3 "^^xsd:integer Patrick Stickler

Tuesday, 9 September 2003

• Re: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Dan Brickley
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Brian McBride
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Brian McBride
• Re: about " 3 "^^xsd:integer Frank Manola
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Jeremy Carroll
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Patrick Stickler
• Re: 2003-09-05 Semantics bug? "All classes are subclasses of themselves." Dan Brickley
• Re: 2003-09-05 Semantics bug? "All classes are subclasses of themselves." Graham Klyne
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Brian McBride
• RE: escaping % in RDF URI references Jeremy Carroll
• draft response to pfps re nfc Jeremy Carroll
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Graham Klyne
• Re: % in URIs Jeremy Carroll
• Re: about " 3 "^^xsd:integer Jeremy Carroll
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: about " 3 "^^xsd:integer Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Monday, 8 September 2003

• fwd: experiences with SOAP media type registration Dan Brickley
• Re: 2003-09-05 Semantics bug? "All classes are subclasses of themselves." Dan Brickley
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals pat hayes
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals pat hayes
• Re: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Brian McBride
• Re: 2003-09-05 Semantics bug? "All classes are subclasses of themselves." pat hayes
• Re: about " 3 "^^xsd:integer pat hayes
• RE: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals Brian McBride
• 2003-09-05 Semantics bug? "All classes are subclasses of themselves." Dan Brickley
• Re: about " 3 "^^xsd:integer Patrick Stickler

Saturday, 6 September 2003

• Re: % in URIs Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 5 September 2003

• Re: about " 3 "^^xsd:integer Jos De_Roo
• Re: New RDFCore documents are now availiable Dan Brickley
• minutes 2003-09-05 (draft for approval) Dan Brickley
• Re: New RDFCore documents are now availiable Eric Miller
• RDF MIME registration Graham Klyne
• Re: New RDFCore documents are now availiable Frank Manola
• Re: New RDFCore documents are now availiable Frank Manola
• Re: about " 3 "^^xsd:integer Frank Manola
• Re: about " 3 "^^xsd:integer Dan Connolly
• New RDFCore documents are now availiable Eric Miller
• about " 3 "^^xsd:integer Jos De_Roo
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-09-05 Dan Brickley
• RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-09-05 Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-09-05 Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-09-05 Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: N-Triples Unicode Ambiguity Dave Beckett
• N-Triples Unicode Ambiguity Dan Brickley

Thursday, 4 September 2003

• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-09-05 Mike Dean
• publication request status Dan Brickley
• The wrapper designs Jeremy Carroll
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-09-05 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-09-05 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• RE: Action needed: subClassOf on datatypes Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Wednesday, 3 September 2003

• Re: test case WD available Jos De_Roo
• Re: burning issue [was Re: weekly call for telecon agenda items] Dan Brickley
• burning issue [was Re: weekly call for telecon agenda items] Frank Manola
• weekly call for telecon agenda items Dan Brickley
• new TAG issue: rdfURIMeaning-39 Dan Brickley
• RDFS pubrules ready Dan Brickley
• mail archives back, improved Dan Brickley
• Re: % in URIs Brian McBride
• Re: semantics and lbase docs Brian McBride
• Re: semantics and lbase docs Jeremy Carroll
• test case WD available Jan Grant
• Re: semantics and lbase docs Frank Manola
• Tiny Concepts change Re: ACTIONS: 2003-08-29#5, 2003-08-29#7 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ACTIONS: 2003-08-29#5, 2003-08-29#7 Jeremy Carroll
• RDF/XML Syntax WD draft ready after xmlsch-02 whitespace de-fudge Dave Beckett
• Re: % in URIs Brian McBride
• Re: semantics and lbase docs Jeremy Carroll
• Re: % in URIs Graham Klyne
• ACTIONS: 2003-08-29#5, 2003-08-29#7 Graham Klyne
• Re: Action needed: subClassOf on datatypes Jeremy Carroll
• semantics and lbase docs pat hayes
• Re: Action needed: subClassOf on datatypes Jan Grant
• Re: Action needed: subClassOf on datatypes pat hayes
• Re: Action needed: subClassOf on datatypes pat hayes
• Re: Action needed: subClassOf on datatypes Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 2 September 2003

• Re: Action needed: subClassOf on datatypes Jan Grant

Wednesday, 3 September 2003

• Re: Document status? (was Re: Minutes for RDFCore telecon: 2003-08-29) Frank Manola

Tuesday, 2 September 2003

• Re: New Charmod 2003-08-22 Dave Beckett
• Re: Action needed: subClassOf on datatypes Jos De_Roo
• Re: Action needed: subClassOf on datatypes Jos De_Roo
• Re: Document status? (was Re: Minutes for RDFCore telecon: 2003-08-29) Jeremy Carroll
• [Fwd: Re: WD between LC and CR/PR] Jeremy Carroll
• % in URIs Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Document status? (was Re: Minutes for RDFCore telecon: 2003-08-29) Eric Miller
• xmsch-02 whitespace Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Action needed: subClassOf on datatypes Graham Klyne
• Document status? (was Re: Minutes for RDFCore telecon: 2003-08-29) Eric Miller
• Re: Minutes for RDFCore telecon: 2003-08-29 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Action needed: subClassOf on datatypes Jeremy Carroll
• Re: (draft) SOTD for Sept 5th RDFCore WDs Jeremy Carroll
• Re: (draft) SOTD for Sept 5th RDFCore WDs Frank Manola
• Re: (draft) SOTD for Sept 5th RDFCore WDs Eric Miller
• Re: (draft) SOTD for Sept 5th RDFCore WDs Eric Miller
• Re: New Charmod 2003-08-22 Dan Brickley
• Re: Action needed: subClassOf on datatypes Dan Brickley
• Re: New Charmod 2003-08-22 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: (draft) SOTD for Sept 5th RDFCore WDs Graham Klyne
• Re: Action needed: subClassOf on datatypes Graham Klyne
• Re: Action needed: subClassOf on datatypes Graham Klyne
• Re: (draft) SOTD for Sept 5th RDFCore WDs Dan Brickley
• Re: (draft) SOTD for Sept 5th RDFCore WDs Brian McBride
• Re: New Charmod 2003-08-22 Dan Brickley
• Re: New Charmod 2003-08-22 Jeremy Carroll
• (draft) SOTD for Sept 5th RDFCore WDs Dan Brickley
• mail archive wedged Dan Brickley
• Re: Action needed: subClassOf on datatypes Jan Grant
• Re: revised Primer for publication Eric Miller
• Re: Action needed: subClassOf on datatypes Dan Connolly
• Re: Action needed: subClassOf on datatypes Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rule rdfD4 not correct, may affect test case Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Lbase document update for 0905 pat hayes
• Action needed: subClassOf on datatypes pat hayes
• Re: issues with the 5 Sept version of RDF Semantics pat hayes
• rule rdfD4 not correct, may affect test case pat hayes

Monday, 1 September 2003

• Re: Lbase document update for 0905 pat hayes
• Re: Godzilla (was Re: pfps-06 hold off?) pat hayes
• revised Primer for publication Frank Manola
• Draft rdf/xml syntax 2003-09-05 Dave Beckett
• New Charmod 2003-08-22 Dave Beckett
• Minutes for RDFCore telecon: 2003-08-29 Jan Grant
• Re: semantics doc for publication. Brian McBride
• Godzilla (was Re: pfps-06 hold off?) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: xmlsch-02 Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 21:17:26 UTC