- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 10:53:57 -0400
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
The difference between the txt below and http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/templates/sept-wd-sotd.html is that they're anticipating a CR as their next phase, whereas LC2 looks more likely for us. I don't feel the need to nail that one down at this stage though... There are a few phrases might be worth borrowing though. [[ This > > interim publication is used to document the progress made on > > addressing the comments received during the second Last Call, as > > well as other modifications resulting from continuing collaboration > > with other working groups. ]] Perhaps dropping 'interim' since we don't name our next stage? Dan * Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> [2003-09-02 15:31+0100] > > > They got very close to CR a month or two ago ... > > I would certainly prefer this sort of wording in our SOTD for the 5th Sept > publication. > > I guess that is Eric's call, as advised by the chairs. > > Jeremy > > > Dave Beckett wrote: > > >Character Model for the World Wide Web 1.0 > >W3C Working Draft 22 August 2003 > > > >http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-charmod-20030822/ > > > >First one since April 2002. Interesting wording: > > > > [[This is a W3C Working Draft published between the second Last > > Call on 30 April 2002 and a planned Candidate Recommendation. This > > interim publication is used to document the progress made on > > addressing the comments received during the second Last Call, as > > well as other modifications resulting from continuing collaboration > > with other working groups. A list of last call comments with their > > status can be found in the disposition of comments (public version, > > Members only version). > > > > Work is still ongoing on addressing the comments received during > > the second Last Call. We do not encourage comments on this Working > > Draft; instead we ask reviewers to wait for being informed about > > our disposition of their comments, or for Canditate Recommendation > > in case of new comments. ... ]] > > > >maybe we could have something similar? > > > >The changes aren't entirely clear since they are in a member only web > >page that could be updated at any time compared to the above. > > > >Dave > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2003 10:54:08 UTC