W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2003

Re: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 17:23:18 +0100
Message-ID: <3F5DFE76.5060604@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Patrick Stickler wrote:
> I've tried to be careful not to describe it as a proposal.  This is an 
> alternative design.  I'm not proposing it, just describing it.
> 	At this stage in the game, are "descriptions that
> 	aren't proposals" really productive? Can there
> 	even be such a distinction?

I did wonder about that, but was persuaded by Danbri that it was worth 
sending this in.

I'm certain there is a distinction between advocacy and description. 
I'm not proposing this in the sense that I'm interested in understanding 
this design better, but am not proposing that we change the current design.

Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2003 15:44:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:25 UTC