- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:01:25 +0300
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0196 IRC log: http://www.w3.org/2003/09/19-rdfcore-irc Summary: DECISIONS: No control characters in RDF URI References Informative warnings for the abuse of IRIs SCHEDULE: Comment deadline: 02 Oct LC2 Docs ready 08 Oct Publish LC2 13 Oct ??? End LC2 comments 03 Nov Sumamry of ACTIONS ================= DanbrI 2003-08-29#2 script for fixing up internal references by next weel produce boiler plate for SOTD e-mail rdfinterest with 02 Oct comment deadline e-mail chairs list concerning LC 2 identify and e-mail individual chairs re LC 2 jjc review syntax text on bnode IDs change URI text in concepts respond to pfps on URIs cc martin e-mail webont with 02 Oct comment deadline suggest herman makes personal comment before webont OK path To consider amendments to test cases concerning nonentailments Check link to RDF URI Reference from Semantics to Concepts bwm s/none/no response/ in last call comments em Poke Michael concerning xmlsch-02 contact comm to get publication date date: 20030919 Chair: bwm 1: scribe jjc 2: Roll Call Regrets from Stickler, Connolly Present Manola, Emiller, Jeremy, PatH, JosD Jan, DaveB, Brian, Gk, Danbri, MikeD 3: Review Agenda jjc: URI proposal to be under 9, jos: Negative entailment tests as AOB 4: Next telecon 26 Sep 2003 1000 Boston Time Chair: scribe missed this Volunteer Scribe: Graham 5: Minutes of 12 Sep 2003 telecon as revised by See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0173.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0174.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0187.html Approved. 6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions ACTION: 2003-02-07#4 danbri reference the appropriate definition of "triple" in RDFS. ACTION: 20030718#18 DaveB Revise syntax doc to only references to other document status ACTION: 20030815#7 jjc review syntax changes ACTION: 2003-08-29#1 daveb track down LC comments on wrapper solution for XMLLiteral ACTION: 2003-08-29#4 jjc to prepare a response to peter on charmod ACTION: 2003-08-29#5 jjc to respond to peter on %s in URIs ACTION: 2003-09-12#1 danbri announce 5 September 2003 WDs to www-rdf-interest with the I18N issue specifically called out. ACTION: 2003-09-12#2 danbri send a request to webont to look at 5 September 2003 WDs ACTION: 2003-09-12#4 DanC write email to the WG to propose to change RDF so that there are no syntax errors in URIs (in the rdf:resource attribute etc.) ACTION: 2003-09-12#5 DanC ask XML Schema WG for a response on the xmlsch-02 issue ACTION: 2003-09-12#6 jjc response to pfps using the proposal in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0143 with minor updates All confirmed. 7: Confirm Status of Withdrawn Actions ACTION: 2002-11-22#3 patH Tie MT datatype to the sec that points out language is not significant ACTION: 2003-08-29#6 jang remove xmlsch-02 test cases. All confirmed. 8: Status of Misc Actions 2003-01-03#1 bwm check whether to update http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns 2003-04-11#16 em Request that the documents at the end of the rdf and rdfs ns uris be updated 20030711#4 danc to get a test case for pfps-09 into OWL test case doc 2003-08-29#2 danbri to investigation production of script for fixing up internal references All continued - note 2003-08-29#2 will be done within a week. 9: next steps - planning for LC2 Decision: 2nd last call WDs will record changes between LC1 and LC2 Changes between LC2 and 05/09 separate from changes between 05/09 and LC1 Also all editors to use copy from TR page (last published draft). What needs to be done? ==================== Primer - one fix in response to comment, change affiliation of editor Syntax - minor editorial fixes Schema - minor editorial fixes Concepts - NFC, and URIs see below Semantics - clarifying proof appendix, check link to RDF URI reference Test Cases - OK LBase - small changes tracking semantics ACTION jjc review syntax text on bnode IDs ACTION path Check link to RDF URI Reference from Semantics to Concepts NFC === Some editorial changes agreed between DaveB, JJC and PFPS. These impact normative text to clarify when NFC is needed. PFPS still seems to want more informative text, which the editors have declined. Pfps: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0339.html JJC argues against such text, indicating charmod is better. URI === Original point on % is resolved. WG does not want to take Namespaces 1.1 text Allowing ctrl characters was a mistake Latest IRI draft now prohibits space and some other characters. Proposals A and B from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0207 RESOLVED RDF concepts is changed to prohibit control characters in RDF URI References RESOLVED concepts is changed to informatively permit implementations to issue a warning for the use of RDF URI references not conforming to IRI draft or its successors ACTION jjc change URI text in concepts ACTION jjc respond to pfps on URIs cc martin What issues/comments do we need to respond to. ======================================= Discussion of comments list ====================== ACTION bwm s/none/no response/ in last call comments I18N issue ========= Procedural discussion, last week minutes adequately record that we were not convinced by I18N comments. xmsch-02 ======= We are expecting response any time now. ACTION em Poke Michael concerning xmlsch-02 Schedule? ======== Discussed http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0195.html agreed Comment deadline: 02 Oct LC2 Docs ready 08 Oct Publish LC2 13 Oct ??? End LC2 comments 03 Nov ACTION ericm contact comm to get publication date ACTION danbri produce boiler plate for SOTD ACTION jjc e-mail webont with 02 Oct comment deadline ACTION danbri e-mail rdfinterest with 02 Oct comment deadline ACTION danbri e-mail chairs list concerning LC 2 ACTION danbri identify and e-mail individual chairs re LC 2 ACTION jjc suggest herman makes personal comment before webont OK AOB Negative entailment tests ==================== Problem concerning incompleteness of ruleset based reasoners See e.g. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Sep/0103.html Discussion concerning whether the completeness of RDF and RDFS entailment rules helped. Jos won by mentioning datatype non-entailments. ACTION PatH To consider amendments to test cases concerning nonentailments Meeting closed. swebscrape:N3:python: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/scripts/minutes2n3.py
Received on Friday, 19 September 2003 12:01:29 UTC