W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2003

Re: collecting objections

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:57:27 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org

Hello Dan,

Many thanks for this. The changes you made at the top are a very
good capture of the status.

Regards,    Martin.

At 09:34 03/09/26 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
>On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 08:42, Brian McBride wrote:
> >
> > My present inclinitation is to ask I18N whether they have decided to
> > raise a formal objection and if so, to refer us to publicly accessable
> > text describing their objection to which we can refer in the last call
> > announcement.  That would seem to resolve any ambiguity and gives I18N
> > the opportunity to clearly explain their concerns.
>Martin gave us a pointer; I called him to confirm that this
>is a reasonable thing to use as the position of the I18N WG,
>and he confirmed.
>I copied it to
>and updated the status from saying "draft, we will
>work on this more" to just...
>This document is perhaps not as polished as one would like. Some
>sections are rather well worked out, others are not. A lot of links
>could be added.
>$Date: 2003/09/26 14:32:11 $
>Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 26 September 2003 10:59:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:25 UTC