- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:57:27 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
Hello Dan, Many thanks for this. The changes you made at the top are a very good capture of the status. Regards, Martin. At 09:34 03/09/26 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: >On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 08:42, Brian McBride wrote: >[...] > > > > My present inclinitation is to ask I18N whether they have decided to > > raise a formal objection and if so, to refer us to publicly accessable > > text describing their objection to which we can refer in the last call > > announcement. That would seem to resolve any ambiguity and gives I18N > > the opportunity to clearly explain their concerns. > >Martin gave us a pointer; I called him to confirm that this >is a reasonable thing to use as the position of the I18N WG, >and he confirmed. > >I copied it to >http://www.w3.org/2003/09/ri434.html > >and updated the status from saying "draft, we will >work on this more" to just... > >[[ >This document is perhaps not as polished as one would like. Some >sections are rather well worked out, others are not. A lot of links >could be added. >]] >$Date: 2003/09/26 14:32:11 $ > > >-- >Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 26 September 2003 10:59:15 UTC