Re: (draft) SOTD for Sept 5th RDFCore WDs

I18N issue draft SOTD for concepts:
[[
A notable change
since the Last Call publication is the simplification
of typed literals to exclude language tags.
The Working Group particularly seeks feedback on the
impact of this change on the datatype
rdf:XMLLiteral.
]]

I would suggest that the syntax SOTD should highlight that
For a property element with rdf:parseType="Literal"
an xml:lang attribute on  it or one of its ancestors
is ignored.

Jeremy


Dan Brickley wrote:

> * Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> [2003-09-02 15:59+0100]
> 
>>looks ok to me.
>>
>>I suggest that we particularly want to highlight i18n's xml lang/xml 
>>literal issue and request feedback, say in both concepts and in syntax, 
>>and in the announcement.
>>
> 
> Yes, at least in the documents. I didn't attempt this in the boilerplate
> I drafted since it is intended to be mixed-in with per document text.
> 
> 
>>Does it make sense for such highlighting to go in the status section?
>>
> 
> I think so.
> 
> Dan
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2003 11:58:09 UTC