- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:36:11 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: phayes@ihmc.us, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 16:06, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: [...] > I am unaware of any ambiguities in the XML Schema documents in this area. I thought it was really clear too, but when I went to trace the line of reasoning in the text of the spec, I found this oddness: "integer has the following ˇconstraining facetsˇ: ... whiteSpace ..." -- http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#integer "[Definition:] A constraining facet is an optional property that can be applied to a datatype to constrain its ˇvalue spaceˇ." -- http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#dt-constraining-facet So the whitespace facet constrains the *value space* of integer somehow? Maybe that's spurious (I just sent a message to xmlschema-comments seeking clarification). But I hope it makes it more clear why the RDF Core WG deliberates the way it does. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 15 September 2003 09:36:12 UTC