Re: rdfcore 2003-09-25 telecon agenda

At 09:24 26/09/03 +0300, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>I was hoping for a very little time on NFC - perhaps that can come under the
>action status.
>
>Peter did not like the last sentence in my proposed amendment, which does 
>link
>off into the part of charmod concerning strings that start with composing
>characters, which we decided *not* to implement.
>
>My proposed amendment is now:
>[[
>The string in both plain and typed literals is required to
>be in Unicode Normal Form C [NFC]. This requirement is motivated
>by [Charmod] particularly section 4 Early Uniform Normalization.
>]]
>
>added to the informative, more introductory,  part of concepts.

Er, your original proposal was precisely that, i.e. to add it to section 
3.4 rather than the normative section 6.5.  What change from your earlier 
proposal are you actually suggesting?

#g


------------
Graham Klyne
GK@NineByNine.org

Received on Friday, 26 September 2003 08:16:08 UTC