- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:47:01 +0100
- To: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
2003-09-12 RDFCore WG meeting (60 mins) Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0153.html Transcript: http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2003-09-12 swebscrape:N3:python:http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/scripts/minutes2n3.py date: 2003-09-12 Roll call: Dave Beckett (scribe) Dan Brickley (chair) Jeremy Carroll Dan Connolly Mike Dean Jan Grant Pat Hayes Graham Klyne Frank Manola Brian McBride Eric Miller Jos De Roo Patrick Stickler Regrets: None Review agenda: Next telecon: 19 Sep 2003 1000 Boston Time for 60 minutes - Jeremy Carroll to scribe 5. Minutes of last telecon: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0147.html (2003-09-05) Approved. 6: Confirm Status of Completed or Withdrawn Actions All confirmed completed or withdrawn as described in agenda. 7: Misc Actions - Status 2002-04-05#2 continued - update the wording to note this is a reminder to keep mime type registration process moving 2002-06-18#11 continued 2002-11-22#3 continued 2002-11-22#4 withdrawn 2002-12-06#10 continued 2003-01-03#1 continued 2003-01-24#14 continued Scribe Note: More from Dan Brickley to be added here. 8: publication status (we have new specs, not been formally announced to RDF lists at time of writing) ACTION 2003-09-12#1 danbri announce 5 September 2003 WDs to www-rdf-interest with the I18N issue specifically called out. ACTION 2003-09-12#2 danbri send a request to webont to look at 5 September 2003 WDs 9: Brian's alternate design writeup: summary of pros/cons There was a discussion on this design (now described as "Martin's design") and several people saw problems: PatrickS, danbri, GrahamK - backward incompatibility bwm (disagreed with backward incompat.) 1) building XML into the core of RDF 2) being "two clever by half" - it needed to be explained several times. jang - agrees with bwm's points jjc - charmod doesn't say always use XML for markup patS, gk - XML in the RDF gk - stay with what we have DaveB - breaking data, problems with graph to RDF/XML serialization The chair noted that there was no support in the working group for spending further time in this design area now. ACTION 2003-09-12#3 jjc mention other designs in I18N proposed response 10: escaping % in RDF URI refs: can this be wrapped up? Jeremy reported there is a need for a change on what is said about control characters and maybe on spaces in URIs, or say less. He proposed adding a note about fixing it in an Errata in future. DaveB asked that future promises weren't made. DanC raised wanting to make a substantive change by changing RDF URIrefs to say less (or nothing) by refering entirely to another definition. Jeremy noted we need absolute uris, and thus resolving of relative ones such as against xml:base, so the URI RFC alone isn't sufficient. ACTION 2003-09-12#4 DanC write email to the WG to propose to change RDF so that there are no syntax errors in URIs (in the rdf:resource attribute etc.) 12: " 3 "^^xsd:integer / xml schema and whitespace: can this be wrapped up? RDF Core's xmlsch-02 issue response was http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0097.html ACTION 2003-09-12#5 DanC ask XML Schema WG for a response on the xmlsch-02 issue 13: response to pfps re NFC ACTION 2003-09-12#6 jjc response to pfps using the proposal in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0143 with minor updates 11: Internationalization (not reached) The meeting closed.
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2003 09:47:48 UTC