Re: semantics and lbase docs

• From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
• Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 10:37:21 +0100
• To: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
• Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, Brian_McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• Message-ID: <3F55B651.1000605@hplb.hpl.hp.com>

pat hayes wrote:


> For some reason, the pubrules checker thinks that there is something 
> wrong with the boilerplate, but it seems to have all the links and 
> things that the checker says are missing, all cut-and-pasted from docs 
> that the checker was OK with. The other filters are OK.
> 


Yes it's very fussy - concepts gets through - I was following Frank's msg.

I suggest that whoever picks up on semantics SOTD copies it from concepts 
or primer.

Guessing: the problem with DanBri's boiler plate was that a paragraph was 
required to be in <em> and wasn't.

Jeremy

Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2003 05:57:36 UTC