- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:08:13 -0400
- To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
raw irc logs: http://www.w3.org/2003/09/05-rdfcore-irc.html * bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> [2003-09-04 16:25+0100] > > Time: > 10:00:00 Fri Sep 05 2003 in America/New York duration 60 minutes + possible 15 minute extension > > which is equivalent to > 15:00:00 Fri Sep 05 2003 in Europe/London > > Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332 > irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore > > 1: scribe bwm > > Please could the minutes conform to: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0216.html > > > > 2: Roll Call > > > > 3: Review Agenda > > > 4: Next telecon 12 Sep 2003 1000 Boston Time > Volunteer Scribe > > > > 5: Minutes of 29 Aug 2003 telecon > > > See: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0003.html > > > 6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions > > ACTION: 2002-11-22#2 jang > [test case fix] remove RDFS entailment rules from the language-ignored-for-numeric-types cases. > > ACTION: 2003-02-14#4 bwm > terminology: check "a resource" [in schema?] > > ACTION: 2002-02-28#13 frankM > update primer to reflect disposition of danc-01 > > ACTION: 2003-03-14#3 gk > chase Aaron > > see: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0412.html > > ACTION: 2003-03-14#5 editors > check for use of term "asserted" and modify in the light of comment macgregor-01 > > ACTION: 2003-03-21#9 bwm > update issue list to point to PatH > > ACTION: 2003-03-21#8 editors > check the use of the term [node] is correct in their documents > > ACTION: 2003-04-04#9 jang > Remove bagId tests from test cases. > > ACTION: 2003-04-04#12 jjc > review the test cases for NFC constraints. > > ACTION: 20030425#2 jang > add test case for pfps-10 (from originating email) > > ACTION: 20030425#10 em > carry xmlsch WG > > ACTION: 20030509#12 jang > Review all tests to make changes concerning typed literals > > ACTION: 20030509#20 jang > Is inverse of test case 0097 true or not? > > ACTION: 2003-05-16#11 PatH > check for changes to Semantics in light timbl-03 decision > > ACTION: 20030627#6 JanG > add tests for intensional subClassOf semantics. > > ACTION: 20030718#1 JJC > apply pfps-22/23 changes as agreed last week > > ACTION: 20030718#2 JJC > remove normative references to RDFS URI > > ACTION: 20030718#3 JJC > remove references to term "RDF core" in Concepts > > ACTION: 20030718#7 JanG > update test case language-and-xml-literal to be positive > > ACTION: 20030718#10 JJC > Update xmlsch-02 manifest with additional test:entailmentRules > > ACTION: 20030718#15 BWM > Review Schema (after pending edits) > > ACTION: 20030718#16 JJC > Run ARP against all syntax tests > > ACTION: 20030815#8 jang > review test cases in light of XMLLiteral > > ACTION: 20030815#10 jang > ensure test cases affected by WS processing are marked with a note in the TC document > > ACTION: 2003-08-22#6 em > circulate a target publication date > > ACTION: 2003-08-29#3 gk > check CONCEPTS 6.4 wrt details of URI and "%" > > ACTION: 2003-08-29#4 danbri > update status of this document for WD > > see: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/templates/lc2-stod > > ACTION: 2003-08-29#5 gk > to liase with JJC on removal of WS "fudge" from concepts > > ACTION: 2003-08-29#7 (all > editors) update cross-references to 5 Sept documents > > > > 7: Confirm Status of Withdrawn Actions > > ACTION: 2003-02-07#3 jang > in Dave Bs absence, check over syntax to see if any s/p/o terminological use is likely to require revision > > ACTION: 20030509#13 em > Review primer to make changes concerning typed literals > > ACTION: 20030627#12 jang > review concepts document. > > ACTION: 20030627#13 path > review concepts document. > > ACTION: 20030718#13 BWM > Review Primer > > ACTION: 20030718#14 DaveB > Review Primer > > ACTION: 20030815#2 danbri > summarise rubyrdf for em > > ACTION: 20030815#3 jjc > chase an HP endorsement of the impl report > > see: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0239.html > > ACTION: 20030815#13 jjc > inform XMLSCHEMA WG wrt whitespace resolution > > ACTION: 20030808#5 bwm > review section 4.5 of current ED of primer. > > ACTION: 2003-08-22#3 PatH > check whether pfps is now satisfied on pfps-06. > > > > 8: Doc Publishing status > 2003-08-01#2 daveb sync with aaron on macintosh file type > and make sure the docs are consistent and use the same type > 2003-08-29#2 jang check for/create if nec the xsd:string-entails > plain literal test case. > > 2003-08-29#6 jang remove xmlsch-02 test cases. > > Error reports: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0205.html > > > > 9: Doc Publishing - script for cross references > > > > 10: heads up re TAG rdfURIMeaning-39 and public-sw-meaning > > See: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0068.html > > > 11: xmlsch-02 > [[ > I think this means that we should be regarding Dave's comment as > currently unaddressed, since there has been no formal resolution to > decline the comment. > ]] > > Status of this comment > > > See: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0038.html > > > 12: Datatype subclasses > > > See: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0011.html > > > 13: I18N Comments > Status > > > > 14: Outstanding comments > > pfps on normalization > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0283.html > > pfps comment on sectin 6.4 of concepts > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0282.html > > pfps on semantics > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0279.html > > > > > 15: next steps > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant, running on Jena 2
Received on Friday, 5 September 2003 11:08:13 UTC