W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2003

Re: (draft) SOTD for Sept 5th RDFCore WDs

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 11:07:27 -0400
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20030902150727.GI6971@w3.org>

* Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> [2003-09-02 15:59+0100]
> looks ok to me.
> I suggest that we particularly want to highlight i18n's xml lang/xml 
> literal issue and request feedback, say in both concepts and in syntax, 
> and in the announcement.

Yes, at least in the documents. I didn't attempt this in the boilerplate
I drafted since it is intended to be mixed-in with per document text.

> Does it make sense for such highlighting to go in the status section?

I think so.

Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2003 11:10:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:25 UTC