- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 16:15:31 +0200
- To: "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I'll ask peter what he thinks ... maybe we can have a couple of minutes on this at the telecon. It is an editorial change so strictly speaking I don't need WG blessing. Jeremy > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Beckett [mailto:dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk] > Sent: 25 September 2003 14:52 > To: Jeremy Carroll > Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg > Subject: Re: NFC > > > On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:22:06 +0200 > Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Having declined to make editorial improvements, I have been > thinking some > > more. > > > > It was not the principle of greater editorial clarity that I > minded, more > > the specifics that Peter was suggesting. > > > > A possible editorial improvement that I could support is as follows: > > > > At the end of > > section 3.4 Literals (informative) > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-concepts-20030905/#section-Literals > > add the following new para > > > > [[ > > The string in both plain and typed literals is required to > > be in Unicode Normal Form C [NFC]. This requirement is motivated > > by [Charmod] particularly section 4 Early Uniform Normalization. > > The strings of literals can be considered > > <a href= > > "http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod/#def-construct"> > > constructs</a> > > in the sense used in that section. > > ]] > > > > and add charmod into the informative references. > > That looks good to me; I've already had to explain to an end-user of my > RDF parser what the NFC check failure meant and had to point them at the > charmod document, so explaining the motivation is good. > > Dave >
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2003 10:24:32 UTC