- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 12:51:31 +0100
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
This looks OK to me. #g -- At 13:22 25/09/03 +0200, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >Having declined to make editorial improvements, I have been thinking some >more. > >It was not the principle of greater editorial clarity that I minded, more >the specifics that Peter was suggesting. > >A possible editorial improvement that I could support is as follows: > >At the end of >section 3.4 Literals (informative) >http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-concepts-20030905/#section-Literals >add the following new para > >[[ >The string in both plain and typed literals is required to >be in Unicode Normal Form C [NFC]. This requirement is motivated >by [Charmod] particularly section 4 Early Uniform Normalization. >The strings of literals can be considered ><a href= >"http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod/#def-construct"> >constructs</a> >in the sense used in that section. >]] > >and add charmod into the informative references. > >Jeremy ------------ Graham Klyne GK@NineByNine.org
Received on Friday, 26 September 2003 08:16:05 UTC