- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 02:06:14 +0200
- To: "Dan Brickley <danbri" <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
I still LOVE that design and along interpretationproperties
I eg can't find anything wrong with the lang issue variation
_:b eg:name _:c.
_:c lang:fi "Ora Yrjö Uolevi Lassila".
--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Dan Brickley
<danbri@w3.org> To: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Sent by: cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
w3c-rdfcore-wg-req Subject: Re: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought.
uest@w3.org
2003-09-19 12:45
AM
* pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> [2003-09-18 17:40-0500]
>
> Just in case it wasn't clear from my last message, I withdraw the
> suggestion about treating lang tags as property values, and no longer
> think that we should even consider that design.
Thanks for the tour of that corner of design space. I think we know
enough to not go there this side of (hypothetical) RDF 2.0.
Dan
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2003 20:06:20 UTC