- From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 19:55:14 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 09:27, Brian McBride wrote: >> Dan Connolly wrote: >> > On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 05:00, Graham Klyne wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> > >> > Moreover, I maintain that horn rules is a correct implementation >> > strategy, and I consider anything to the contrary a bug. >> > While I'd rather that were stated in so many words in the spec, >> > I'm willing to accept that the burden is on me (and like-minded >> > reviewers) to find any such bugs. I'm fairly confident >> > there aren't any. >> >> Dan, >> >> Can I take that as an indication that you will not oppose making the >> entailment rules non-normative? > >Er... be careful what you ask for. > >If you put the question (again), I may very well take a strong >stand in favor of making them normative. > >So don't do that. ;-) > >The record doesn't compel the editor to make them normative. > >The record apparently disagrees with the memory of serveral of us, >but all of us had a chance (and an obligation) to correct >the record and we did not. > >I trust the editors (both the series editor and the >semantics editor) to do something reasonable. Thanks for your vote of confidence. I will proceed to do something reasonable. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2003 20:55:17 UTC