- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 00:56:35 +0200
- To: "Dan Connolly <connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Dan Connoly wrote: > On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 10:15, Jos De_Roo wrote: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#integer says > > [[ > > integer has the following ·constraining facets·: > > ... > > whiteSpace > > ... > > ]] > > I don't see how that's relevant. > > The lexical space of the integer datatype is specified thus: > > [[[ > 3.3.13.1 Lexical representation > integer has a lexical representation consisting of a finite-length > sequence of decimal digits (#x30-#x39) with an optional leading sign. If > the sign is omitted, "+" is assumed. For example: -1, 0, 12678967543233, > +100000. > ]]] > > Nothing about spaces. Nothing about spaces, that's true. I have to admit that from an implementation point of view lexical spaces don't matter that much... -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ PS In xerces-2_5_0 it is now possible to use an IntegerDV instead of DecimalDV for all numbers (to avoid Patrick's "1.0"^^xsd:integer case) but I will wait till Jena has it - my tests with replacing the /Jena-2.0/lib/xercesImpl.jar were successful, but my AskJena is otherwise not downwards compatible.
Received on Friday, 5 September 2003 18:56:44 UTC