W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2003

Re: (draft) SOTD for Sept 5th RDFCore WDs

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 15:59:30 +0100
Message-ID: <3F54B052.6020108@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

looks ok to me.

I suggest that we particularly want to highlight i18n's xml lang/xml 
literal issue and request feedback, say in both concepts and in syntax, 
and in the announcement.

Does it make sense for such highlighting to go in the status section?


Dan Brickley wrote:
> * Eric Miller <em@w3.org> [2003-09-02 09:08-0400]
>>Danbri, how are you doing on your action item on the boilerplate SOTD?
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/templates/sept-wd-sotd.html
> I'd appreciate a sanity check from WG and at least one of 
> Brian or Eric before folk start copying and pasting. Of course 
> each spec needs it's own info re per-doc changes too, see the @@section
> for where to put that.
> The guts of the SOTD is:
> 	This Working Draft consolidates changes and editorial improvements
> 	undertaken in response to feedback received during the Last Call
> 	publication of the RDFCore specifications which began on 23 January
> 	2003.
> ...brief, factual and not really getting into business of where we
> expect to go next.
> Dan
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2003 11:04:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:25 UTC