- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 11:58:31 +0100
- To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- Cc: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Dave Reynold's original comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0076.html [[ PositiveEntailmentTest xmlsch-02/Manifest.rdf#whitespace-facet-3 - FAIL This tests bNode introduction - that a typed literal entails a graph with a bNode of type rdf:Literal. We have deliberately omitted the bNode introduction rules from the reasoner config on the grounds that this is not the way an RDF API should do it - users can query the nodes themselves for type information and creating virtual triples for this would be wrong from an API perspective. ** Failures - could fix: NegativeEntailmentTest xmlsch-02/Manifest.rdf#whitespace-facet-2 - FAIL NegativeEntailmentTest xmlsch-02/Manifest.rdf#whitespace-facet-1 - FAIL These test non-mutual entailment of a valid literal with an invalid literal that differs only by whitespace. Unfortunately our XSD handling library is happy with the whitespace and doesn't treat " 3 " as an invalid int. This could be fixed if that is indeed how XSD is supposed to work, though the current behaviour seems more useful in practice. ]] Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: > Could someone please provide a pointer to the actual comment... > > Thanks, > > Patrick > >
Received on Friday, 5 September 2003 07:34:53 UTC