spec-prod@w3.org from October to December 2011 by author

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: References (Saturday, 24 December)
• Re: Other designation than "Editor"? (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Other designation than "Editor"? (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Friday, 16 December)

Arthur Barstow

• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 1 December)

Aryeh Gregor

• Re: Using GitHub for specification development (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: Using GitHub for specification development (Wednesday, 9 November)

Bert Bos

• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: Capitalization Wars (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Running ReSpec in headless browser? (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: [link-relations] draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00 (Sunday, 23 October)
• Re: Use of <a name="xxx" id="xxx"> in text/html specs (Monday, 3 October)

Bob Lund

• respec.js feature request (Wednesday, 14 December)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 7 December)
• References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 1 December)

David Carlisle

• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Saturday, 24 December)
• Re: Other designation than "Editor"? (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Use of <a name="xxx" id="xxx"> in text/html specs (Monday, 3 October)
• Re: Use of <a name="xxx" id="xxx"> in text/html specs (Monday, 3 October)

Denis Ah-Kang

• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Running ReSpec in headless browser? (Monday, 28 November)

Doug Schepers

• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 6 December)

Eric Johnson

• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 1 December)

fantasai

• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Saturday, 24 December)
• Capitalization Wars (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [restyle-content] Boilerplate Contents: Requirements and Recommendations (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 7 December)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 1 December)

Francois Daoust

• Re: Using ReSpec.js for publication as Interest Group Note (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Using ReSpec.js for publication as Interest Group Note (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Using ReSpec.js for publication as Interest Group Note (Tuesday, 29 November)

Fred Baker

• Re: Other designation than "Editor"? (Wednesday, 21 December)

Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com

• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)

Giuseppe Pascale

• Re: Feature request for diff links (was: Re: [respec] acronyms) (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Feature request for diff links (was: Re: [respec] acronyms) (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: [respec] acronyms (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: [respec] acronyms (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: [respec] acronyms (Tuesday, 22 November)
• [respec] acronyms (Tuesday, 22 November)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: Using GitHub for specification development (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: Using GitHub for specification development (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: Using GitHub for specification development (Wednesday, 9 November)

Harald Alvestrand

• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 13 December)

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: Capitalization Wars (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Thursday, 15 December)
• CC license on figures in specs? (Thursday, 15 December)

Håkon Wium Lie

• Re: Capitalization Wars (Tuesday, 20 December)

Ian Jacobs

• Re: Other designation than "Editor"? (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: Joint specs (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Friday, 9 December)

Jim Melton

• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 13 December)

John Allsopp

• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 8 December)

Julian Reschke

• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Monday, 28 November)

Karl Dubost

• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Monday, 5 December)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: W3C Publications Ecosystem Breakout Summary (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: W3C Publications Ecosystem Breakout Summary (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: Using GitHub for specification development (Wednesday, 9 November)

Liam R E Quin

• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Saturday, 24 December)
• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Friday, 16 December)

Loretta Guarino Reid

• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 29 November)

Marcos Caceres

• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Saturday, 24 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Saturday, 24 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Other designation than "Editor"? (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Other designation than "Editor"? (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: [restyle-content] Boilerplate Contents: Requirements and Recommendations (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Friday, 9 December)
• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 8 December)
• What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: W3C Publications Ecosystem Breakout Summary (Friday, 11 November)
• Re: W3C Publications Ecosystem Breakout Summary (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: W3C Publications Ecosystem Breakout Summary (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: W3C Publications Ecosystem Breakout Summary (Thursday, 10 November)

Martin J. Dürst

• Re: Capitalization Wars (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Friday, 16 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Friday, 2 December)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 29 November)

Noah Mendelsohn

• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Saturday, 24 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Monday, 12 December)
• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Saturday, 3 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 1 December)

Norman Walsh

• Re: Capitalization Wars (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: Using GitHub for specification development (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: Using GitHub for specification development (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Use of <a name="xxx" id="xxx"> in text/html specs (Monday, 3 October)

Richard Ishida

• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Monday, 28 November)

Robin Berjon

• Re: Other designation than "Editor"? (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Capitalization Wars (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: ReSpec.js and pubrules (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Joint specs (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: [restyle-content] Boilerplate Contents: Requirements and Recommendations (Tuesday, 13 December)
• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 8 December)
• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Friday, 2 December)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: Using ReSpec.js for publication as Interest Group Note (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Using ReSpec.js for publication as Interest Group Note (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Using ReSpec.js for publication as Interest Group Note (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: ReSpec patch for IE9+ (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Running ReSpec in headless browser? (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Feature request for diff links (was: Re: [respec] acronyms) (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: [respec] acronyms (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: [respec] acronyms (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: [respec] acronyms (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: [respec] acronyms (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: W3C Publications Ecosystem Breakout Summary (Friday, 11 November)
• Re: Using GitHub for specification development (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: W3C Publications Ecosystem Breakout Summary (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: Using GitHub for specification development (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: Using GitHub for specification development (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: Using GitHub for specification development (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: Using GitHub for specification development (Thursday, 10 November)
• W3C Publications Ecosystem Breakout Summary (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: Using GitHub for specification development (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: Using GitHub for specification development (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Using GitHub for specification development (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: including the FPWD's "customized paragraph" using respec.js (Friday, 7 October)
• Re: Use of <a name="xxx" id="xxx"> in text/html specs (Monday, 3 October)
• Re: Use of <a name="xxx" id="xxx"> in text/html specs (Monday, 3 October)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: Using GitHub for specification development (Wednesday, 9 November)

Shane McCarron

• ReSpec.js and pubrules (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Friday, 2 December)
• Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: Feature request for diff links (Wednesday, 23 November)

Steve Faulkner

• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Thursday, 1 December)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 30 November)

Stéphane Corlosquet

• Re: Using GitHub for specification development (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: Using GitHub for specification development (Wednesday, 9 November)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: Capitalization Wars (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: CC license on figures in specs? (Thursday, 15 December)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Wednesday, 7 December)

Timothy Lebo

• including the FPWD's "customized paragraph" using respec.js (Friday, 7 October)

Vincent Hardy

• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Monday, 28 November)
• Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: W3C Publications Ecosystem Breakout Summary (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: W3C Publications Ecosystem Breakout Summary (Thursday, 10 November)

Last message date: Saturday, 24 December 2011 22:27:33 UTC