- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:00:51 -0600
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: spec-prod@w3.org
On 16 Dec 2011, at 7:53 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:45:38 +0100, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: >> On 16 Dec 2011, at 7:39 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:11:39 +0100, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: >>>> I don't think that situation is stable; I do not expect that licensing approach is compatible. >>> >>> Are you saying that what the HTML WG is doing is problematic? >> >> I am talking about Editor's Drafts with different licenses. Is that what you are referring to? > > Yes. The HTML WG publishes text based on http://svn.whatwg.org/ which uses a different license than what the HTML WG publishes on TR/. > > We could also discuss the DOM if you prefer. Which is was initially developed at http://simon.html5.org/specs/web-dom-core and then developed at https://bitbucket.org/ms2ger/dom-core/ and now jointly with the W3C also at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/ (because of Mercurial the repository can be shared). I believe there is uncertainty about the DOM draft's license. Ian > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > > -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Friday, 16 December 2011 14:00:58 UTC