- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:19:51 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: "spec-prod\@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Nov 9, 2011, at 17:13 , Norman Walsh wrote: > Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> writes: >> It requires some practical tweaking: >> >> • It would be unacceptable to have all the history of development >> of some specifications stored with a third party server, so it would >> have to be synced with W3C's repositories. It looks like >> http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/ConvertExtension could cover that on >> a cron job (or commit hook). > > Github also has an "enterprise" product that (it appears) would allow > W3C to have their own github setup. That would have all the tecnical > advantages, I assume, but might lack the social advantage of being at > github. If that's important. Ah, I couldn't find it last I looked but this was just released last week. That being said, losing the social side is IMHO a serious downside, and I'm rather confident that $5k for 20 users is slightly over the W3C's budget :) -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2011 16:20:26 UTC