W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Using ReSpec.js for publication as Interest Group Note

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:51:17 +0100
Message-ID: <4ED4E355.4010007@w3.org>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
CC: spec-prod@w3.org
On 11/29/2011 02:26 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2011, at 13:52 , Francois Daoust wrote:
>> Yeepee!
> Have you tested it? I'd like to be sure that it works in someone else's hands :)

Right, "yeepee" is not exactly semantically rich... I tested it your updates locally. The generated result is fine, yes.

I just committed a fix for a nit in the SOTD since ReSpec.js generated "Publication as a Interest Group Note [blah]" instead of "Publication as *an* Interest Group Note [blah]".


>> I'm slightly leaning towards not including that sentence but I don't feel strongly one way or the other. I'd say that a Note is often a final stage and saying that the document is not expected to become a W3C Recommendation still suggests that it could become something else. The SOTD should already contain a customized paragraph mentioning the group's expectations about potential further steps.
> Okay, I've pulled it.
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 13:51:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:16 UTC