- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:51:17 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- CC: spec-prod@w3.org
On 11/29/2011 02:26 PM, Robin Berjon wrote: > On Nov 29, 2011, at 13:52 , Francois Daoust wrote: >> Yeepee! > > Have you tested it? I'd like to be sure that it works in someone else's hands :) Right, "yeepee" is not exactly semantically rich... I tested it your updates locally. The generated result is fine, yes. I just committed a fix for a nit in the SOTD since ReSpec.js generated "Publication as a Interest Group Note [blah]" instead of "Publication as *an* Interest Group Note [blah]". Francois. > >> I'm slightly leaning towards not including that sentence but I don't feel strongly one way or the other. I'd say that a Note is often a final stage and saying that the document is not expected to become a W3C Recommendation still suggests that it could become something else. The SOTD should already contain a customized paragraph mentioning the group's expectations about potential further steps. > > Okay, I've pulled it. >
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 13:51:47 UTC