W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: CC license on figures in specs?

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 23:54:36 -0800
Message-ID: <4EEAF93C.8060804@inkedblade.net>
To: spec-prod@w3.org
On 12/15/2011 07:59 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 14:00 -0800, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:55 PM, fantasai<fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>  wrote:
>>> [...] we might want to make an update to the
>>> Document License saying that examples and figures are in the public domain.
> [...]
>> I extra-agree with this.  I specifically try to write examples that
>> show (relatively simple) real-world uses of the feature, and being
>> able to legally copy-paste those examples is a good thing.
> Being able to reuse the examples, and to make derivative works, is good.
> Note that (as Tab I think mentioned in another post) the Public Domain
> is not a concept shared by all legal systems. For example, I cannot,
> strictly speaking, create works "in the public domain" here in Canada:
> certain rights are inalienable here. However, I can say that anyone who
> wishes may reuse my works, provided that attribution is given.
> So CC may be a better route to essentially the same goal.

No, we really *don't* want to require attribution for people to take
our code examples and use them. That's silly. Wrt Public Domain's legal
status, this is what CC0 is for.

Received on Friday, 16 December 2011 07:57:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:16 UTC