W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Using ReSpec.js for publication as Interest Group Note

From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:26:55 +0100
Cc: spec-prod@w3.org
Message-Id: <A9BE72A9-F48E-4A9D-BEAA-4A95FC9F0254@berjon.com>
To: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
On Nov 29, 2011, at 13:52 , Francois Daoust wrote:
> Yeepee!

Have you tested it? I'd like to be sure that it works in someone else's hands :)

> I'm slightly leaning towards not including that sentence but I don't feel strongly one way or the other. I'd say that a Note is often a final stage and saying that the document is not expected to become a W3C Recommendation still suggests that it could become something else. The SOTD should already contain a customized paragraph mentioning the group's expectations about potential further steps.

Okay, I've pulled it.

Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 13:27:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:16 UTC