- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:53:09 +0100
- To: spec-prod@w3.org
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:45:38 +0100, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > On 16 Dec 2011, at 7:39 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:11:39 +0100, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: >>> I don't think that situation is stable; I do not expect that licensing >>> approach is compatible. >> >> Are you saying that what the HTML WG is doing is problematic? > > I am talking about Editor's Drafts with different licenses. Is that what > you are referring to? Yes. The HTML WG publishes text based on http://svn.whatwg.org/ which uses a different license than what the HTML WG publishes on TR/. We could also discuss the DOM if you prefer. Which is was initially developed at http://simon.html5.org/specs/web-dom-core and then developed at https://bitbucket.org/ms2ger/dom-core/ and now jointly with the W3C also at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/ (because of Mercurial the repository can be shared). -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 16 December 2011 13:56:23 UTC