Speaking of all the contrast issues, can we please ensure that the new
style meets WCAG 2.0 AA? I haven't yet done an analysis, but this should be
a requirement.
Thanks,
Loretta
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com> wrote:
> Dear Working Group Chairs,
>
> As part of editorial work in the CSS and SVG Working Groups, I have
> started a specification styling project to improve the readability of our
> specifications. I have been working with Ben Schwarz, a designer and
> typographer with experience [1] in this area. I will also be working with
> Elika Etemad and Divya Manian on this effort. We have an Editor's Draft
> that illustrates the draft styles:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transforms/
> (select the 'additional spec. style toggle in the upper right).
>
> and also:
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/raw-file/tip/custom/index.html
> (which uses the style by default).
>
> If you are interested in providing feedback on the styles or wish to
> participate in this project, please contact me, otherwise no actions are
> required of your group. In a few months, in coordination with the W3C Comm
> Team, we will assess the feedback we receive and determine whether we
> should seek broader adoption of the styles.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Vincent Hardy
>
> [1] http://developers.whatwg.org/
>