- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:07:19 -0500
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- CC: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, "chairs@w3.org" <chairs@w3.org>, "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 18:19:27 +0100, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: > 4. Do we really still need a bibliography when we use hypertext and in the age of living standards? > [...] > Can't we just do away with bibliographies and just cross link to > specifications. On 12/1/2011 1:44 PM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > Not in a printed version, Another reason: whether we like it or not, links sometimes go 404, and there certainly is a risk that if links are to undated versions, fragids that once resolved may later fail to. Having a proper biblio entry this provides redundancy and better conveys the intention of the link. If I see a biblio entry, and the link fails (happens especially with IETF drafts that tend to go missing when versioned), then I know what to go looking for. Noah
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2011 20:07:48 UTC