Re: CC license on figures in specs?

On 12/15/2011 08:35 AM, Ian Jacobs wrote:
>
> On 15 Dec 2011, at 10:27 AM, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>
>> Anybody ever put e.g. a CC 3.0 Sharealike with citation license on one
>> or more figures in a W3C Rec.?  Any reason not to?
>
> Hi Henry,
>
> I believe that would conflict with the Document License.

Indeed. Which brings up an issue: we might want to make an update to the
Document License saying that examples and figures are in the public domain.
Example code, especially. The point is to allow them as a starting point
for reuse. :)

~fantasai

Received on Thursday, 15 December 2011 21:55:48 UTC