Friday, 30 March 2007
Thursday, 29 March 2007
- Bugzilla under attack?
 - Re: Caching
 - Re: Caching
 - XProc Minutes 29 Mar 2007
 - Re: Extension element
 - Putative next public working draft
 - Re: Errors
 - Re: Extension element
 
Wednesday, 28 March 2007
- Re: Extension element
 - Re: Caching
 - Re: Errors
 - Re: Ignored namespaces and Ignored prefixes
 - Ignored namespaces and Ignored prefixes
 - XProc Agenda 29 Mar 2007
 - Re: New review draft
 - Re: Parameter handling
 - Re: Parameter handling
 - Re: More notes about the standard components
 - Re: More notes about the standard components
 - Parameter handling
 - New review draft
 - Re: More notes about the standard components
 - Re: Review draft
 - Re: More notes about the standard components
 - Re: Review draft
 - More notes about the standard components
 - Re: Review draft
 
Tuesday, 27 March 2007
- Re: Review draft
 - Review draft
 - Re: Add to environment: declare steps/pipelines
 - Add to environment: declare steps/pipelines
 
Sunday, 25 March 2007
Saturday, 24 March 2007
- Re: Standard components
 - Re: Standard components
 - Re: Standard components
 - Re: minor issues with examples
 - Re: Standard components
 - Re: Extension element
 - Caching
 - minor issues with examples
 - Re: Extension element
 - Re: Standard components
 - Re: Extension element
 
Friday, 23 March 2007
Thursday, 22 March 2007
- Re: Required names?
 - Re: Required names?
 - Re: Required names?
 - Re: Standard components
 - Required names?
 - Re: Standard components
 - Extension element
 - XProc Minutes 22 Mar 2007
 - Re: Standard components
 - Re: Standard components
 - Open issues
 - Re: minor glitches wrt 'p:insert'
 - Re: Taking good care of the environment . . .
 - Re: XSL FO step
 - Re: Standard components
 - Re: Ignored namespaces
 - Standard components
 
Wednesday, 21 March 2007
- Re: declare-step type
 - Re: Ignored namespaces
 - Re: Taking good care of the environment . . .
 - Re: Taking good care of the environment . . .
 - Re: Are pipelines in the same library visible to each other?
 - minor glitches wrt 'p:insert'
 - Taking good care of the environment . . .
 - Slightly updated draft
 - XProc Agenda 22 Mar 2007
 - Re: Are pipelines in the same library visible to each other?
 - Re: declare-step type
 - Re: Are pipelines in the same library visible to each other?
 - Re: Import precedence/Overriding pipelines
 - Re: Are pipelines in the same library visible to each other?
 - Re: Are pipelines in the same library visible to each other?
 - Re: Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
 - Re: Import precedence/Overriding pipelines
 - Are pipelines in the same library visible to each other?
 - Re: declare-step type
 - Re: Ignored namespaces
 - Re: declare-step type
 - Re: Import precedence/Overriding pipelines
 - Re: Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
 - Re: declare-step type
 - Re: Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
 - Re: Ignored namespaces
 
Tuesday, 20 March 2007
Monday, 19 March 2007
- Re: A valid pipeline?
 - Re: A valid pipeline?
 - Re: A valid pipeline?
 - Re: A valid pipeline?
 - Re: A valid pipeline?
 - Re: A valid pipeline?
 - Re: A valid pipeline?
 - Re: A valid pipeline?
 - Re: A valid pipeline?
 - Re: A valid pipeline?
 - Re: A valid pipeline?
 - A valid pipeline?
 
Friday, 16 March 2007
- Re: XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
 - W3C XML Schema and DTD for XProc updated
 - Re: XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
 - Re: Where can ignored content go?
 - Re: XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
 - Re: XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
 - Re: Where can ignored content go?
 - Re: Where can ignored content go?
 - Re: Where can ignored content go?
 - Re: XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
 - Re: Where can ignored content go?
 - Re: Where can ignored content go?
 - Where can ignored content go?
 - Re: XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
 - Re: XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
 - Re: XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
 - Re: XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
 - Re: component questions
 - Re: component questions
 - XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
 - Re: component questions
 - Re: Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
 - Re: Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
 - Re: Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
 - Re: Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
 - Re: Empty p:inline
 
Thursday, 15 March 2007
- Re: Empty p:inline
 - Re: Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
 - Re: component questions
 - Re: Ignored namespaces
 - Re: Empty p:inline
 - Document or sequence
 - XProc Minutes 15 Mar 2007
 - Re: Yet another draft
 - Re: Review of Spec
 - Empty p:inline
 - Ignored namespaces
 - Re: Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
 - Re: component questions
 - Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
 - Re: component questions
 - Re: component questions
 - Re: component questions
 - Re: component questions
 - Re: Review of Spec
 - Re: pipe/@step
 - Re: Review of Spec
 - Re: pipe/@step
 - Re: Review of Spec
 - Re: Review of Spec
 - Re: pipe/@step
 - Re: Review of Spec
 - Re: Review of Spec
 - pipe/@step
 - component questions
 - component questions
 - Re: Yet another draft
 - Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents
 - Re: Review of Spec
 - Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents
 - Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents
 - Re: default pipeline input
 
Wednesday, 14 March 2007
- Review of Spec
 - DTD and W3C XML Schema
 - p:catch and p:when
 - Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents
 - Yet another draft
 - Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents
 - Re: XProc Agenda 15 Mar 2007
 - Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents
 - Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents
 - Re: XProc Agenda 15 Mar 2007
 - Re: 5.7 Other steps
 - Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents
 - XProc Agenda 15 Mar 2007
 - Re: p:ignore-prefixes and p:choose
 - Re: 5.7 Other steps
 - Re: why _p:_ignore-prefixes
 - Re: why _p:_ignore-prefixes
 - Re: why _p:_ignore-prefixes
 - Re: default pipeline input
 - Re: why _p:_ignore-prefixes
 - Re: why _p:_ignore-prefixes
 - Re: why _p:_ignore-prefixes
 - p:ignore-prefixes and p:choose
 - 5.7 Other steps
 - why _p:_ignore-prefixes
 
Tuesday, 13 March 2007
Monday, 12 March 2007
- Re: default pipeline input
 - Re: Options and parameters proposal
 - Re: default pipeline input
 - Re: viewport-source and iteration-source element names
 - Re: default pipeline input
 - Re: viewport-source and iteration-source element names
 - Re: viewport-source and iteration-source element names
 - Re: In-scope namespaces and parameter values
 - Re: viewport-source and iteration-source element names
 - Re: default pipeline input
 - Re: viewport-source and iteration-source element names
 - Re: computed ports and viewports
 - Re: In-scope namespaces and parameter values
 - Re: In-scope namespaces and parameter values
 - Re: In-scope namespaces and parameter values
 - Re: viewport-source and iteration-source element names
 - Re: Options and parameters proposal
 
Sunday, 11 March 2007
Friday, 9 March 2007
- Re: computed ports and viewports
 - Re: In-scope namespaces and parameter values
 - Re: computed ports and viewports
 - New snapshot draft
 - In-scope namespaces and parameter values
 - Re: computed ports and viewports
 - Re: computed ports and viewports
 - viewport-source and iteration-source element names
 - computed ports and viewports
 
Thursday, 8 March 2007
Wednesday, 7 March 2007
- Re: XProc Agenda 8 Mar 2007
 - Re: XProc Agenda 8 Mar 2007
 - Re: Options and parameters proposal
 - Re: Options and parameters proposal
 - Re: Options and parameters proposal
 - Re: Options and parameters proposal
 - Re: Options and parameters proposal