Friday, 30 March 2007
Thursday, 29 March 2007
- Bugzilla under attack?
- Re: Caching
- Re: Caching
- XProc Minutes 29 Mar 2007
- Re: Extension element
- Putative next public working draft
- Re: Errors
- Re: Extension element
Wednesday, 28 March 2007
- Re: Extension element
- Re: Caching
- Re: Errors
- Re: Ignored namespaces and Ignored prefixes
- Ignored namespaces and Ignored prefixes
- XProc Agenda 29 Mar 2007
- Re: New review draft
- Re: Parameter handling
- Re: Parameter handling
- Re: More notes about the standard components
- Re: More notes about the standard components
- Parameter handling
- New review draft
- Re: More notes about the standard components
- Re: Review draft
- Re: More notes about the standard components
- Re: Review draft
- More notes about the standard components
- Re: Review draft
Tuesday, 27 March 2007
- Re: Review draft
- Review draft
- Re: Add to environment: declare steps/pipelines
- Add to environment: declare steps/pipelines
Sunday, 25 March 2007
Saturday, 24 March 2007
- Re: Standard components
- Re: Standard components
- Re: Standard components
- Re: minor issues with examples
- Re: Standard components
- Re: Extension element
- Caching
- minor issues with examples
- Re: Extension element
- Re: Standard components
- Re: Extension element
Friday, 23 March 2007
Thursday, 22 March 2007
- Re: Required names?
- Re: Required names?
- Re: Required names?
- Re: Standard components
- Required names?
- Re: Standard components
- Extension element
- XProc Minutes 22 Mar 2007
- Re: Standard components
- Re: Standard components
- Open issues
- Re: minor glitches wrt 'p:insert'
- Re: Taking good care of the environment . . .
- Re: XSL FO step
- Re: Standard components
- Re: Ignored namespaces
- Standard components
Wednesday, 21 March 2007
- Re: declare-step type
- Re: Ignored namespaces
- Re: Taking good care of the environment . . .
- Re: Taking good care of the environment . . .
- Re: Are pipelines in the same library visible to each other?
- minor glitches wrt 'p:insert'
- Taking good care of the environment . . .
- Slightly updated draft
- XProc Agenda 22 Mar 2007
- Re: Are pipelines in the same library visible to each other?
- Re: declare-step type
- Re: Are pipelines in the same library visible to each other?
- Re: Import precedence/Overriding pipelines
- Re: Are pipelines in the same library visible to each other?
- Re: Are pipelines in the same library visible to each other?
- Re: Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
- Re: Import precedence/Overriding pipelines
- Are pipelines in the same library visible to each other?
- Re: declare-step type
- Re: Ignored namespaces
- Re: declare-step type
- Re: Import precedence/Overriding pipelines
- Re: Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
- Re: declare-step type
- Re: Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
- Re: Ignored namespaces
Tuesday, 20 March 2007
Monday, 19 March 2007
- Re: A valid pipeline?
- Re: A valid pipeline?
- Re: A valid pipeline?
- Re: A valid pipeline?
- Re: A valid pipeline?
- Re: A valid pipeline?
- Re: A valid pipeline?
- Re: A valid pipeline?
- Re: A valid pipeline?
- Re: A valid pipeline?
- Re: A valid pipeline?
- A valid pipeline?
Friday, 16 March 2007
- Re: XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
- W3C XML Schema and DTD for XProc updated
- Re: XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
- Re: Where can ignored content go?
- Re: XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
- Re: XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
- Re: Where can ignored content go?
- Re: Where can ignored content go?
- Re: Where can ignored content go?
- Re: XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
- Re: Where can ignored content go?
- Re: Where can ignored content go?
- Where can ignored content go?
- Re: XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
- Re: XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
- Re: XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
- Re: XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
- Re: component questions
- Re: component questions
- XProc editor's draft 2007-03-16
- Re: component questions
- Re: Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
- Re: Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
- Re: Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
- Re: Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
- Re: Empty p:inline
Thursday, 15 March 2007
- Re: Empty p:inline
- Re: Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
- Re: component questions
- Re: Ignored namespaces
- Re: Empty p:inline
- Document or sequence
- XProc Minutes 15 Mar 2007
- Re: Yet another draft
- Re: Review of Spec
- Empty p:inline
- Ignored namespaces
- Re: Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
- Re: component questions
- Pipeline Composition and our Recent Pipeline Name/Library Decision
- Re: component questions
- Re: component questions
- Re: component questions
- Re: component questions
- Re: Review of Spec
- Re: pipe/@step
- Re: Review of Spec
- Re: pipe/@step
- Re: Review of Spec
- Re: Review of Spec
- Re: pipe/@step
- Re: Review of Spec
- Re: Review of Spec
- pipe/@step
- component questions
- component questions
- Re: Yet another draft
- Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents
- Re: Review of Spec
- Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents
- Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents
- Re: default pipeline input
Wednesday, 14 March 2007
- Review of Spec
- DTD and W3C XML Schema
- p:catch and p:when
- Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents
- Yet another draft
- Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents
- Re: XProc Agenda 15 Mar 2007
- Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents
- Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents
- Re: XProc Agenda 15 Mar 2007
- Re: 5.7 Other steps
- Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents
- XProc Agenda 15 Mar 2007
- Re: p:ignore-prefixes and p:choose
- Re: 5.7 Other steps
- Re: why _p:_ignore-prefixes
- Re: why _p:_ignore-prefixes
- Re: why _p:_ignore-prefixes
- Re: default pipeline input
- Re: why _p:_ignore-prefixes
- Re: why _p:_ignore-prefixes
- Re: why _p:_ignore-prefixes
- p:ignore-prefixes and p:choose
- 5.7 Other steps
- why _p:_ignore-prefixes
Tuesday, 13 March 2007
Monday, 12 March 2007
- Re: default pipeline input
- Re: Options and parameters proposal
- Re: default pipeline input
- Re: viewport-source and iteration-source element names
- Re: default pipeline input
- Re: viewport-source and iteration-source element names
- Re: viewport-source and iteration-source element names
- Re: In-scope namespaces and parameter values
- Re: viewport-source and iteration-source element names
- Re: default pipeline input
- Re: viewport-source and iteration-source element names
- Re: computed ports and viewports
- Re: In-scope namespaces and parameter values
- Re: In-scope namespaces and parameter values
- Re: In-scope namespaces and parameter values
- Re: viewport-source and iteration-source element names
- Re: Options and parameters proposal
Sunday, 11 March 2007
Friday, 9 March 2007
- Re: computed ports and viewports
- Re: In-scope namespaces and parameter values
- Re: computed ports and viewports
- New snapshot draft
- In-scope namespaces and parameter values
- Re: computed ports and viewports
- Re: computed ports and viewports
- viewport-source and iteration-source element names
- computed ports and viewports
Thursday, 8 March 2007
Wednesday, 7 March 2007
- Re: XProc Agenda 8 Mar 2007
- Re: XProc Agenda 8 Mar 2007
- Re: Options and parameters proposal
- Re: Options and parameters proposal
- Re: Options and parameters proposal
- Re: Options and parameters proposal
- Re: Options and parameters proposal