- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:58:50 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 3/28/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > I suggest that we rename 'join-sequences' to simply 'join'. > > I propose 'split' > > <p:declare-step type="p:split"> > <p:input port="source" sequence="yes"/> > <p:output port="*"/> > </p:declare-step> I'm a little bit doubtful about how you will use this component ? You have to know in advance how many element there is in the sequence, isn'it ? > > The inverse of join. > > Surely the serialize component must serialize the root element and its > attributes so that given: > > <description> > <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> > <p>This is a chunk of XHTML.</p> > </div> > </description> > > it produces: > > <c:result><description> > <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> > <p>This is a chunk of XHTML.</p> > </div> > </description></c:result> > > I think we should move the micro-operations up before the optional > components and assert that they are all required. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh > XML Standards Architect > Sun Microsystems, Inc. > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 12:59:01 UTC