- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:38:28 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2007 14:38:36 UTC
/ Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say: | I think we need to think about having an optional XSL FO step. I would | see this working like the "store" step. The step wouldn't | have an output and the rendered document would be saved to a URI | specified either by parameter or by a mangling of the base URI of | the input document (e.g. change foo.xml to foo.pdf). Yes. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh XML Standards Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2007 14:38:36 UTC