- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:07:05 +0000
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mmphh. I suppose the use case you have in mind is where you have a
library you mostly like, but there's something in it you need/want to
change.
This seems much more plausible for pipelines than for step
definitions, but it's probably easier to adopt a uniform approach.
So I have _some_ sympathy with defining a story about precedence,
following the SGML/XML external/internal subset story.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGAR/pkjnJixAXWBoRAtW7AJ9YLg2OGDbcrDJsKj6DAWioUPc+ZACfSxLT
tzNhnutlsnUaRtAx5IajNw4=
=BRjI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2007 12:07:09 UTC