- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 12:06:41 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2007 16:06:57 UTC
The caching issue has me quite concerned. I see three options: 1. We say nothing about it. Some implementations will cache, others won't. Even on systems that don't cache, side effects of operation will sometimes make caching appear to happen and sometimes not. 2. We require caching. This may be a significant implementation issue. It looks like a big step for V1. 3. We forbid caching. This may be a significant implementation issue. It may not even be possible for some implementations to prevent side effects from "effective" caching. The interoperability problems of choice 1 disturb me, but I've always expected to do caching. Are there other options? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh XML Standards Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2007 16:06:57 UTC