- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:26:01 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2007 19:26:35 UTC
On 3/20/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > > > But is this? > > <p:pipeline-library> > > <p:import href="somelib.xml"/> > > <p:declare-step type="x:foo"> > <p:input port="source/"> > <p:input port="otherstuff/"> > <p:output port="result"/> > </p:declare-step> > > </p:pipeline-library> > > Where somelib.xml contains: > > <p:pipeline-library> > > <p:declare-step type="x:foo"> > <p:input port="source/"> > <p:output port="result"/> > </p:declare-step> > > </p:pipeline-library> I'm not sure that makes sense. While the implementation might change, the step's signature should remain the same. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2007 19:26:35 UTC