- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:37:01 +0000
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm still unsure that blurring the distinction between language constructs and atomic steps was a good idea. In particular, I think 5.7 Other Steps is needlessly confusing, because it tries to cover both atomic and compound steps. I think the tableau should be split into two versions, one for atomic steps and one for compound steps, with only the latter requiring a discussion of the environment. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF995dkjnJixAXWBoRAjV/AJ9Gf2rMZxaziXrTowZE2XTw5J09EACeNzpL 67I3hQlujIpKdUXMcwErht0= =ds8z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 11:37:16 UTC