- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:18:03 +0100
- To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 3/15/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > / ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say: > | Norman Walsh writes: > | > |> |> * Why don't we use xs:boolean for boolean flags instead of "yes" and "no" > |> |> (e.g. the sequence attribute on p:input)? > |> | > |> | Hear hear! > |> > |> No. We don't use any XSD types anywhere else, why here? I don't plan > |> to have an XSD-aware XProc pipeline processor. > | > | Understood -- the proposal is to allow true|false|0|1 instead of > | yes|no > > /me shrugs. > > So you want to be consistent with XML Schema instead of XSLT? That > seems an odd choice for XProc. XML Schema instead of XSLT ***and XML Prolog*** It is surely an odd choice > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh > XML Standards Architect > Sun Microsystems, Inc. > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 15:18:29 UTC