- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:53:25 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <878xe0t29m.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com> was heard to say: | On 3/12/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: |> We don't currently allow 'default' on p:input so I think I'd prefer to |> say that if a pipeline has a single input, that becomes the default |> readable port for the pipeline, otherwise the author has to specify |> the first connection. | | This rule makes sense to me. This is also consistent with what we are | doing with step outputs, namely "If a step has exactly one output | port, or if one of its output ports is explicitly designated as the | default" (section 2.2), but we don't consider that if there are | multiple outputs declared, the first one will be the default. That's not the case. If there are multiple outputs, there is only a default if exactly one of them specifies default="yes". There's no "first one" rule for p:outputs. There's no "first one" rule for p:inputs either :-), but following Henry's lead, I'm suggesting that we make such a rule, but only on p:pipeline. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh XML Standards Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 12:54:27 UTC