- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:03:32 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 13:03:44 UTC
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: | On 3/28/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: |> I suggest that we rename 'join-sequences' to simply 'join'. |> |> I propose 'split' |> |> <p:declare-step type="p:split"> |> <p:input port="source" sequence="yes"/> |> <p:output port="*"/> |> </p:declare-step> | | I'm a little bit doubtful about how you will use this component ? | You have to know in advance how many element there is in the sequence, isn'it ? Brain cramp on my part. This isn't the opposite of join, I guess. It's more like identity. It produces a copy of its input on each of its outputs. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh XML Standards Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 13:03:44 UTC