- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:57:44 +0000
- To: "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alex Milowski writes:
> * In §5, many of the content models have a preferred order for p:input,
> p:output,
> p:parameter, etc. Why wouldn't we just have a model that allows them in
> any order:
>
> (p:input|p:output|p:parameter|...)*
I like it the way it is. If order isn't significant, pick an order
and require it.
> * Why don't we use xs:boolean for boolean flags instead of "yes" and "no"
> (e.g. the sequence attribute on p:input)?
Hear hear!
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF+RiYkjnJixAXWBoRAgaVAJ4q3YlAwucuHkJRCIk1zqsl534n0wCdFSBn
r9e1X4XMIoFGKp5wVLTNWf0=
=tfv+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 09:57:59 UTC