- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:17:54 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 01:18:03 UTC
On 3/14/07, Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com> wrote: > > > On 3/14/07, Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > > That's a form of serialisation. Not our problem. Maybe a Note to the > > effect that serialisation may have to do namespace (and baseURI) > > fixup. > > Are you saying that you are fine leaving this to the implementation > and having the example Alex gave in the first message of this thread > run fine on some implementations but fail with the error "namespace > for prefix 'm' is not declared"? > > I would rather see this made explicit, one way or another, in the > specification. I agree. I think should say that namespace declarations fixup happens such that the in-scope namespaces and the document element's namespace attributes match for inline documents. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 01:18:03 UTC